A Comparative Study on the Seismic Behaviour of Square and Circular Water Tank Considering Soil-Structure Interaction
Main
K S Jayadeep*
M S Ramya
The seismic performance of elevated water tanks is a major concern due to the large mass of stored water at an elevated level and the flexibility of the supporting staging system. Unlike conventional buildings, the dynamic response of elevated water tanks under seismic loading is complex, depending on tank geometry, staging characteristics, fluid-structure interaction, and soil-structure interaction (SSI). The traditional fixed-base approach assumes a rigid foundation and ignores soil flexibility, potentially leading to inaccurate seismic response predictions, particularly for structures on soft or layered soil. Additionally, water sloshing introduces a dynamic component that further affects tank behaviour. This study presents a comparative numerical investigation of the seismic behaviour of square and circular elevated water tanks, explicitly incorporating SSI. Both tank configurations were analysed under identical geometric, material, loading, and staging conditions to isolate the effect of tank geometry on seismic response. The influence of soil flexibility and water sloshing was considered, and structural responses were compared using natural period, base shear, and displacement. Results show that circular tanks exhibit lower seismic responses than square tanks under both fixed-base and SSI conditions. The influence of SSI becomes more pronounced as soil stiffness decreases, with the fundamental time period increasing by approximately three times under soft-soil conditions relative to the fixed-base case. These findings offer insight into the combined effect of tank geometry and soil–structure interaction on seismic performance, supporting the selection of more suitable and resilient tank configurations for seismic regions.
Bowles, J. E. (1968). Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2000). IS 456: Plain and reinforced concrete-Code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.456.2000.pdf
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2009). IS 3370 (Part 1) Concrete structures for storage of liquids (General requirements). Bureau of Indian Standards. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.3370.1.2009.pdf
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2014). IS 1893 Part 2 : 2014: Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 2 Liquid Retaining Tanks. Bureau of Indian Standards. https://www.nfrlyconstruction.org/uploads/File/Codes/17072023-31_147_IS_1893-part-2-liquid-retaining-structures.pdf_504314034.pdf
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2016). IS 1893 (Part 1): Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards. https://www.cracindia.in/admin/uploads/IS-1893---part-1.pdf
Housner, G. W. (1963). The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 53(2), 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0530020381
IITK-GSDMA. (2007). Guidelines For Seismic Design of Liquid Storage Tanks. National Information Center of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/IITK-GSDMA/EQ08.pdf
Jayadeep, K. S., & Govindaraju, L. (2025). Effect of Stratified Soil Deposit on Seismic Response of Elevated Water Tanks. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (pp. 313-330). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1554-4_30
Livaoğlu, R., & Doğangün, A. (2006). Simplified seismic analysis procedures for elevated tanks considering fluid-structure-soil interaction. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 22(3), 421-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.12.004
Mylonakis, G., & Gazetas, G. (2000). Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction: Beneficial or Detrimental? Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4(3), 277-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460009350372
Quadri, S. S., & Sawant, R. M. (2016). Seismic analysis of RC elevated water tank using different staging pattern. Internatinal Journal of Structural Engineering and Analysis, 3(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.37628/JSEA.V3I1.151
Rai, D. C. (2003). Performance of elevated tanks inM w 7.7 Bhuj earthquake of january 26th, 2001. Journal of Earth System Science, 112(3), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02709269
Soroushnia, S., Tafreshi, S. T., Omidinasab, F., Beheshtian, N., & Soroushnia, S. (2011). Seismic Performance of RC Elevated Water Tanks with Frame Staging and Exhibition Damage Pattern. Procedia Engineering, 14, 3076-3087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.387
Tarwatkar, S. M., & Bias, N. (2021). Seismic behaviour of elevated RCC water tank having different H/D ratio and shape. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 10(8), 236-237. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18537550
