CONTRADICTIONS IN THE LEGAL STATUS OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISE (BUMN) SUBSIDIARIES IN THE PARENT HOLDING COMPANY
Main Article Content
Yuda Tri Pagrelia*
Ariawan Gunadi
The creation of a cluster-based holding company in a State-Owned Enterprise (BUMN) related to core business fields requires careful attention and precise implementation. One must be cautious because issues regarding legal procedures and the legal status of BUMN can still arise. This writing discusses the legal relationship between BUMN Persero and its subsidiaries based on the theory and doctrine of limited liability companies, as well as the contradictory legal status of BUMN subsidiaries within the parent holding company. The research method used in this writing is normative legal research. The findings demonstrate that the piercing the corporate veil doctrine can be employed in terms of evidence, where control of subsidiaries must be exercised by the holding company. Legal responsibility is applicable not only to companies, but also to shareholders as specified in Article 3 paragraph (2) of Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies (UUPT). Once BUMNs become subsidiaries in a holding company, their status as BUMNs, whether BUMN Perum or Persero, changes since their shares are now sourced from the holding company instead of the state. Therefore, BUMNs that become subsidiaries no longer possess legal standing or status as BUMNs, and the state assumes authority over aspects of control concerning BUMNs that have become subsidiaries of the holding company. This authority is indirectly held by the state via the parent/holding company, which represents the government in terms of share ownership, with the majority of shares originating from subsidiaries.
Anggraeny, I. (2016). Analisis Hukum Privatisasi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Dalam Prespektif Pasal 33 ayat (4) UUD 1945. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 24(1), 138–156.
Guntik, D. S., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2022). Corporations As Whistleblowers In The Crime Of Defamation Based On The Electronic And Transaction Information Act. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.43
Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum acara perdata: tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.
Mahmud, P. M. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada.
Natun, J. T. K. S. (2018). status kepemilikan anak perusahaan BUMN. UNIVERSITAS 17 AGUSTUS 1945.
Uly, Y. A. (2023). PTPN Susutkan 14 Perusahaan Jadi 3 Subholding Jamin Tak Ada PHK. Kompas.Com.
Utomo, H. (2014). Kewirausahaan Sosial. Jurnal Menumbuhkan Minat Kewirausahaan Sosial. STIE AMA Salatiga., Vol.17.
Waskito, P. A. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Kepailitan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). NOVUM: JURNAL HUKUM, 3(1), 28–37.
Widjayanti, K. (2011). Manajemen BUMN dan Strategi Privatisasi. Semarang University Press.
