THE LEGAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN BINOMO TRADING FRAUD
(Case Study on Decision Number: 1240/PID.SUS/2022/PN.TNG)
Main Article Content
Bayu Butar Butar*
Ahmad Sudiro
The objective of this study is to analyze the recovery of assets and the protection of victims in cases of Binomo trading fraud under Indonesian criminal law. The research methodology employed is normative legal research, utilizing a literature-based approach. The findings of this study reveal that the decision made by the Panel of Judges in case number 1240: Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tng was deemed unjust for the victims, leading to an appeal hearing resulting in decision number 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.BTN. According to this court decision, the confiscated evidence in the Indra Kenz case was to be returned to the victims through the United Indonesian Traders Association. However, the process of returning the evidence encountered complications due to internal conflicts among the victim association members. As a result, there is currently no clarity regarding the completion of the restitution of the victims' losses. The government, through the LPSK, regulates the restitution of victims' losses as stipulated in Perma Number 1 of 2022. Nevertheless, the LPSK is not involved in the process of returning the victims' losses, which is instead handled by the United Indonesian Traders Association.
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2019). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum edisi revisi. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arbi, I. A. (2022). Perjalanan Kasus Indra Kenz Hingga Divonis 10 Tahun Penjara dan Denda RP5 Miliar. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2022/11/14/20404431/perjalanan-kasus-indra-kenz-hingga-divonis-10-tahun-penjara-dan-denda-rp?page=all
detik.com. (2022). Jejak Kasus Indra Kenz Berujung Vonis 10 Tahun Bui dan Aset Dirampas Negara. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6406725/jejak-kasus-indra-kenz-berujung-vonis-10-tahun-bui-dan-aset-dirampas-negara
Indrawan, L. N., & Munandar, A. (2022). Juridicial Review Implementation of Land Registration According to Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 Concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Units and Land Registration. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.27
Karmen, A. (2001). Crime Victims an Introduction to Victimology (4th ed). Wadswordth.
Margono. (2020). Asas Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim. Sinar Grafika.
Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Cet. Ke-4,(Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2008).
Soekanto, S. (2011). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum: Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2016). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Press.
Suwanti, N. C. (2022). Pakar TPPU: Negara Tidak Boleh DIuntungkan dari Kejahatan Indra Kenz, Ini untuk WIbawa negara. Kompas TV. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/348932/pakar-tppu-negara-tidak-boleh-diuntungkan-dari-kejahatan-indra-kenz-ini-untuk-kewibawaan-negara?page=all
VOI.ID. (2022). Polisi Sebut Uang Korban Penipuan Kasus Binomo dan Quotex dapat Dikembalikan, Tapi Tergantung Putusan Pengadilan. Voi.Id. https://voi.id/berita/144804/polisi-sebut-uang-korban-penipuan-kasus-binomo-dan-quotex-dapat-dikembalikan-tapi-tergantung-putusan-pengadilan
Yanuar, P. M. (2007). Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi Berdasarkan Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi 2023 dalam SIstem Hukum Indonesia. Alumni.
Yulia, R. (2021). Victimologi: Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Kejahatan Edisi 2. Graha Ilmu.
