THE URGENCY OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR SOLVENT COMPANIES WITH GOOD INTENTIONS IN BANKRUPTCY LAW IN INDONESIA

Ketut Suryadinata Putra; Marwanto Marwanto

doi:10.55047/polri.v3i2.1157

THE URGENCY OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR SOLVENT COMPANIES WITH GOOD INTENTIONS IN BANKRUPTCY LAW IN INDONESIA

Ketut Suryadinata Putra*

Marwanto

Keywords: Bankruptcy Corporation Insolvency

Bankruptcy is a situation when the debtors are unable to fulfill their obligations to pay debts to creditors. The requirement for a bankruptcy decision is based on Article 2 paragraph (1), namely that the debtors have two or more creditors and have not paid in full at least one debt that has matured and can be collected. This causes no legal protection for debtor companies that are still solvent and have good intentions from creditors who have bad intentions in abusing bankruptcy law. The debtors with good intentions will certainly find it difficult to face a bankruptcy application if the conditions are only 2+1. Debtor companies that do not pay off their debts do not always have bad intentions but face the threat of bankruptcy which should not be aimed at them. The study aims to understand how Indonesian bankruptcy law can better protect financially stable companies with good intentions from being unfairly declared bankrupt. This research used normative legal research using primary and tertiary legal materials collected from literature and document studies and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this research showed that legal protection and justice can be given to solvent debtors who have good intentions if bankruptcy law in Indonesia provides regulations regarding insolvency tests as an instrument to prove factually whether the debtor's financial condition is still healthy (solvent) or unhealthy (insolvent) so that it is appropriate to sentenced to bankruptcy.

Asra, A. (2015). Corporate Rescue: Key Concept dalam Kepailitan Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 22(4), 513–537. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss4.art1

Budhisatrio, J. B., Harjono, D. K., & Nadapdap, B. (2021). Permohonan Pailit oleh Konsultan Kepada PT. Prudential Life Assurance. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 2(11), 2105–2122. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v2i11.337

Fitzgerald, P. J. (1962). Criminal law and punishment. Clarendon Press.

Gaol, R. L., Tobing, G. L., & Wijayati, R. A. (2021). Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Atas Debitor Pailit Dalam Perkara Kepailitan. To-Ra, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.33541/JtVol5Iss2pp102

Hapsari, R. A., & Nada, Y. S. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Consumer Data Sharing Pada Perusahaan Fintech Ilegal (Studi Kasus Pada Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dan Dinas Kominfo). Jurnal Pahlawan, 4(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31004/jp.v4i2.3022

Helena, I. A. P. D., & Kartika, I. G. A. P. P. (2024). Curator’s Legal Efforts Againts Bankruptcy Estate(BOEDEL) Assets Seized In Criminal Co Confiscation Of Corupption Casess. Policy,Law,Notary And Regulatory Issues 3(2), 3(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i2.1096

Laksmi, N. L. G. S. S., & Astariyani, N. L. G. (2019). Upaya Debitor Untuk Menghindari Kepailitan. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(3), 1–13.

Mait, S. R. L., Frederik, W. A. P. G., & Pinasang, D. R. (2023). Urgensi Penormaan Prinsip Commercial Exit From Financial Distress Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 11284–11298. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i5.2984

Neltje, J., & Panjiyoga, I. (2023). Nilai-Nilai yang Tercakup di Dalam Asas Kepastian Hukum. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 2034–2039. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i5.5009

Pratama, G. A. (2021). Hilangnya Tes Insolvensi sebagai Syarat Kepailitan di Indonesia. Krtha Bhayangkara, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v15i1.450

Purwanto, P. (2022). Subyek Hukum Korporasi Dalam Permohonan Kepailitan Di Indonesia. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(4).

Putri, A. M., & Marwanto, M. (2023). Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Akibat Konsep Likuidasi Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 8(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i02.p6

Putri, R. P., & Prasetyawati, E. (2023). Urgensi Pengaturan Prinsip Minimal Utang Sebagai Syarat Kepailitan Bagi Debitor. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(1), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.197

Radbruch, G. (1932). Legal philosophy.

Shubhan, M. H. (2020). Legal protection of solvent companies from bankruptcy abuse in Indonesian legal system. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(2), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0031