CRIMINAL LEGAL PROTECTION FOR MEDICAL PERSONNEL IN THE RESOLUTION OF MEDICAL DISPUTES
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Yosef Stefan Sutanto*
Medical disputes are a prevalent issue in medical practice, significantly affecting trust between medical personnel and patients. Moreover, the fear of legal repercussions often places medical professionals in ethical quandaries when making critical medical decisions. Therefore, ensuring adequate criminal law protections for medical personnel is essential to enable them to work with peace of mind and concentration. This research explores various forms of criminal law protection for medical personnel in managing medical disputes in Indonesia. Employing the judicial normative analysis method, it primarily examines Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, supplemented by relevant literature and legal documents. Data collection involves analyzing legal texts and pertinent literature, using qualitative data analysis techniques. The study confirms that Law No. 17 of 2023 offers crucial legal safeguards for medical personnel, including the presumption of innocence, liability limitations, and equitable legal procedures. The Indonesian Medical Discipline Honor Council (MKDKI) plays a pivotal role in distinguishing between disciplinary and legal breaches, providing appropriate procedural frameworks. The establishment of the Indonesian Honor Council Mediation and Arbitration Institute (LMA-MKI) proves effective in resolving medical disputes through mediation and arbitration, promoting open communication, mutually beneficial solutions, and safeguarding confidentiality.
Alawiya, N., Utami, N. A. T., & Afwa, U. (2023). Hospital Dispute Settlement Through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in Indonesian Health Law (A Study in Yogyakarta Province). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 23(1), 1–15.
Atmoko, D. (2022). Settlement of medical disputes through the forum of the indonesian medical discipline honory assembly (MKDKI) based on the provisions of article 66 of law number 29 of 2004 concerning medical practice. Awang Long Law Review, 4(2), 432–440.
Baroto, A. W. S., & Mangesti, Y. A. (2023). Presumed Consent Atas Tindakan Medis Berisiko Tinggi Pada Kegawatdaruratan : Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Hukum Dan Etika Kesehatan, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.30649/jhek.v3i2.131
Handini, D. T. (2021). Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tenaga Medis Dalam Penanganan Covid 19. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 9(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v9i1.52619
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Fransisca, Z., Ritonga, F., Pardede, D. J., Almas, S., Sikumbang, N. A., Mutiara, Khoiriyah, A., Hamizah, S., Malahayati, & Suryadi. (2022). Understanding And Describing Relationship Of State Law And Human Right. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business (JHSSB), 1(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v1i1.63
Kusworo, D. L., & Fauzi, M. N. K. (2023). Implementation of Litigation Mediation in Resolving Medical Negligence Disputes Between Patients and Health Workers. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 4(1), 21–36.
Limijadi, E. K., & Purwanto, I. H. (2022). Juridical Review of Non-Litigation Medical Dispute Resolution Between Patients, Doctors and Hospitals in Konawe Regency. SOEPRA, 8(2), 296–304.
Minkó-Miskovics, M., & Ács, G. (2023). The criminal law protection of healthcare workers as persons entrusted with public functions. Orvosi Hetilap, 164(6), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2023.32700
Muhtar, M. H., Pedrason, R., & Harryarsana, I. G. K. B. (2023). Human Rights Constitution on Health Protection of Indonesian Citizens. Russian Law Journal, 11(2), 149–160.
Ortega Villa, E., Medina Valentón, E., García Ramírez, P. E., Pacheco Sánchez, A. A., & Lugo Machado, J. A. (2022). Mediación de conflictos, competencia no difundida en médicos en formación: revisión. Horizonte Médico (Lima), 22(3).
Prayuni, Y., Hidayat, A. N., Lakoro, D. D. K., Jumrati, J., & Fransiska, L. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Kasus Sengketa Medis Pasca UU Kesehatan Tahun 2023. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6), 5479–5491.
Purwoko, D. A. (2023). Analisis Hukum Pidana dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Malapraktik Kedokteran (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 871 K/Pid/2018). Fakultas Magister Hukum, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara.
Suhariyanto, D. (2022). Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights From The Authority of The President In Indonesia. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 2(12), 2684–2690. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v2i12.692
Sukumar, S. (2023). Medical negligence in cases decided by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: A five-year retrospective review. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.
Sulistini, S., Nur, I., & Akhyak, A. (2023). Medical Disputes on the Concept of Inspanningsverbintenis vs Resultaatsverbintenis: A Critical Review. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 103–114.
Susanto, D. S. (2013). Tinjauan Malpraktek Medik Di Indonesia (Kaitan Tanggung Jawab Antara Teori Hukum Kedokteran Dan Praktek Kedokteran). Jurnal Widya Medika, 1(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.33508/jwm.v1i1.842
Tan, S., & Sinaga, W. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis tentang kepastian hukum terhadap tenaga kesehatan tradisional akupunktur di negara indonesia. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i1.187
Timur, S. A. P., Karjoko, L., & Najicha, F. U. (2023). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Kesehatan Jasmani Pasien Gangguan Jiwa Berat di Indonesia. PLEDOI (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan), 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v2i1.179
Wiradharma, D. (1996). Hukum Kes. In Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara. Cet. I.
