CERTIFIED VERSUS UNCERTIFIED ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES: LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND BEST PRACTICES IN INDONESIA
Main Article Content
Farhan Hamka Ilyasa*
Ariawan Gunadi
This article examines the legality and validity of electronic signatures in Indonesia, especially for crucial documents such as the Power of Attorney and Letters of Indemnity, in the light of digital transformation. In this study, a normative legal research method, more popularly known as doctrinal research, was employed, where an in-depth analysis of the legislative texts and available legal materials is needed to construct sound legal reasoning. Approach: The paper combines a conceptual analysis of legal principles with a statutory approach that analyzes whether there is harmony within the various legislative provisions. Various statutes and regulations in Indonesia are critically analyzed, including the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions, Government Regulation concerning the Execution of Electronic Systems and Transactions, and the Minister of Communication and Informatics Regulation on Electronic Certification. The discussion should be centered on what legal provisions must be in place for the acceptance of electronic signatures certified and those not certified. It, therefore, sets out the legal implications of the use of electronic signatures and gives comprehensive recommendations of the best practices as a means of ensuring legal certainty and legality in their implementation in Indonesia. The Journal is intended to assist businesses and lawyers to pass through those issues with ease. To this end, this journal will consider in great detail the legal framework for electronic signatures.
Anshori, I., Rahmi, E., & Syamsir, S. (2022). Polemik Penerapan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Recital Review, 4(2), 353–373.
Budhijanto, D. (2017). Revolusi cyberlaw Indonesia: pembaruan dan revisi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik 2016. PT Refika Aditama.
Cahyadi, T. N. (2020). Aspek Hukum Pemanfaatan Digital Signature Dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi, Akses Dan Kualitas Fintech Syariah. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(2), 219.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2013). Teori dan hukum pembuktian.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Legal Research, Revision. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group.
Maurisa, K. Z. A., & Rahayu, W. P. (2021). Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Pengembangan Mobile Learning Berbasis Android Berbantuan Ispring Suite 9. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Pendidikan, 1(6), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.17977/um066v1i62021p546-558
Mayana, R. F., & Santika, T. (2021). Legalitas tanda tangan elektronik: posibilitas dan tantangan notary digitalization di Indonesia. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 244–262.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.
Partodihardjo, S. (2009). Tanya jawab sekitar Undang-Undang no. 11 tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik: dilengkapi dalam bentuk pointers. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Raharjo, I. S. (2005). Informasi Elektronik pada Electronic-Commerce dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. Universitas Airlangga.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2004). Penelitian hukum normative. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suwignyo, H. (2009). Keabsahan Cap Jempol sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Notarius, 1(1), 63–74.
Wahyuni, E., Rahman, S., & Risma, A. (2022). Keabsahan Digital Signature/Tanda tangan Elektronik Dinjau Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata dan UU ITE. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 3(5), 1082–1098.
