COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON TRENDS AND STRATEGIES FOR COMBATING CYBERCRIME BETWEEN INDONESIA AND DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Main Article Content
Muhammad Ahfadh Fazlurrohman*
Surya Nita
Muhammad Erza Aminanto
Cybercrime has become a significant global threat, targeting individuals, organizations, and governments with increasing sophistication. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of cybercrime trends, patterns, and mitigation strategies between Indonesia and developed countries. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, this research highlights the dominance of phishing and ransomware in Indonesia, often exploiting weak digital literacy and regulatory gaps. Conversely, advanced threats like Advanced Persistent Threats (APT) and AI-based malware are prevalent in developed countries, supported by robust cybersecurity infrastructure and international regulations such as the Budapest Convention. The findings emphasize the urgent need for Indonesia to enhance its cybersecurity readiness through technology adoption, legal framework improvement, and public education. This study offers valuable insights into bridging the cybersecurity gap between developing and developed nations, promoting international collaboration for a safer digital ecosystem. Adopting more modern strategies can be an opportunity for Indonesia to enhance its cyber resilience.
Broadhurst, R., & Chang, L. Y. C. (2012). Cybercrime in Asia: trends and challenges. Handbook of Asian Criminology, 49–63.
Buçaj, E., & Idrizaj, K. (2024). The need for cybercrime regulation on a global scale by the international law and cyber convention. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(1), 2025024.
Fauzi, E., Citra, H., Marwenny, E., & Alfitrianti, N. (2024). Control of Personal Data and Cyber Space by Global Digital Platforms in Relation to Indonesia’s Digital Sovereignty. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 4(1), 149–157.
Ghelerter, D. A., Wilson, J. E., Welch, N. L., & Rusk, J.-D. (2022). Cybercrime in the Developing World.
Imran, M. F. (2023). Cyber Criminology: An analysis of the Indonesian and the United States Police Perception. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(2), 250–261.
Reda, H. T., Anwar, A., Mahmood, A. N., & Tari, Z. (2023). A taxonomy of cyber defence strategies against false data attacks in smart grids. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(14s), 1–37.
Reep-van den Bergh, C. M. M., & Junger, M. (2018). Victims of cybercrime in Europe: a review of victim surveys. Crime Science, 7(1), 1–15.
Siregar, L. H., Fahmi, T., Nasution, I. R., Rozi, F., Harahap, M. T., & Putra, T. D. (2024). Strategi Aman Bertransaksi Digital: Mengedukasi Generasi Milenial Di Era Digital (PKM Desa Medan Krio Kabupaten Deli Serang). Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), 4(3), 690–695.
Suarmita, I. G. N. A., & Purnomo, H. (2024). Challenges of Hybrid Policing in Countering Online Fraud Networks: A Case Study from Sidrap Regency. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1), 17–30.
Suartana, I. M., Putra, R. E., Bisma, R., & Prapanca, A. (2022). Pengenalan pentingnya cyber security awareness pada umkm. Jurnal Abadimas Adi Buana, 5(02), 197–204.
Tropina, T., Callanan, C., & Tropina, T. (2015). Public–private collaboration: Cybercrime, cybersecurity and national security. Self-and Co-Regulation in Cybercrime, Cybersecurity and National Security, 1–41.
Zhuravel, M. V. (2020). Increasing Your Cybersecurity Awareness: Understanding Cybercrime And Finding Ways To Fight It.
