THE CORPORATE CRIME CASE ANALYSIS: CORRUPTION CRIMES AT THE MARITIME SECURITY AGENCY (BAKAMLA) RELATED TO SATELLITE AND DRONE PROCUREMENT INVOLVING PT. MERIAL ESA
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Yosep Jadi Parlindungan Pasaribu*
Surya Nita
Anggi Aulina Harahap
Corporations also play an important role in the flow of change and growth in the world economy. The existence of corporations is also related to control of natural resources and global finance However, it is not uncommon for corporations in their activities to commit deviant acts or crimes with various modus operandi. Crimes committed by corporations are often called corporate crimes. This research paper discusses one case of corporate crime that occurred in Indonesia. This is because the problem of corporate crime has recently become more common. One of them is related to a corruption case at the Bakamla, related to the procurement of satellites and drones involving PT Merial Esa. The verdict determined that PT Merial Esa was found guilty of breaching Article 5, paragraph (1), letter b of Republic of Indonesia Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, as amended by Republic of Indonesia Law Number 20 of 2001, alongside violations of Article 55, paragraph (1), along with Article 64, paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. In addition to the penalties, PT Merial Esa has been fined IDR 200 million and ordered to pay an additional compensation of IDR 126 billion. A significant challenge in addressing this matter has been the presence of an individual whose role remains unclear; their whereabouts are unknown, yet they are believed to be pivotal in illuminating this case. Moreover, the involvement of military personnel complicates matters further, as such cases necessitate specialized handling due to their unique regulations.
Anjari, W. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Sebagai Pelakutindakpidana. Jurnal Ilmiah WIDYA Yustisia, 116 ¬ 121.
detikNews. (2022, April 22). PT Merial Esa Divonis Bayar Denda Rp 200 Juta, KPK Pikir-pikir Banding. Retrieved from detikNews: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6041594/pt-merial-esa-divonis-bayar-denda-rp-200-juta-kpk-pikir-pikir-banding
Diky Anandya, d. (2024). Laporan Evaluasi Kinerja Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Periode 2019 - 2024. Jakarta Selatan: Indonesia Corruption Watch.
Dimant, E., & Tosato, G. (2017). Causes and effects of corruption: What has past decade's empirical research taught us? A Survey. Journal of Economics Survey, 335-356.
Djanim, R., & Halim, P. (2018). Kejahatan Korporasi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana "KaJian terhadap Bentuk Baru Pelaku Kejahatan di Indonesia". Jakarta: UM Jakarta Press.
Ernes, Y. (2024, April 26). KPK Setor Rp 126 M Uang Pengganti PT Merial Esa di Kasus Bakamla ke Negara. Retrieved from detikNews: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7311613/kpk-setor-rp-126-m-uang-pengganti-pt-merial-esa-di-kasus-bakamla-ke-negara
Fadeli, M. N. (2022). Pemegang Saham Selaku Subjek Hukum Pemidanaan. Jurnal Juristic, 3(3).
Fuady, M. (2013). Teori-Teori Besar (Grand Theory) Dalam Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Guntik, D. S., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2022). Corporations As Whistleblowers In The Crime Of Defamation Based On The Electronic And Transaction Information Act. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.43
Hatrik, H. (1995). Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Strict Liability dan Vicarious Liability). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
ICW. (2017, April 16). In-Depth Analysis: Bakamla Bukti Lemahnya KPK Menjerat Aparat Militer. Retrieved from ICW: https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/depth-analysis-bakamla-bukti-lemahnya-kpk-menjerat-aparat-militer
Kahar, M. P., & et al. (2023). elik Suap dan Gratifikasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Kasus Putusan Hakim dalam Praktik Penegakan Hukum. Jurnal Anti Korupsi, 13(1), 46-58.
Kartono, K. (2003). Patologi Sosial. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kristian. (2013). Urgensi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 585-586.
Luthan, S. (1994). Anatomi Kejahatan Korporasi dan Penanggulangannya. Jumal Hukum, 2(1).
MA. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara. Retrieved from Mahkamah Agung.
Miza Nina Adlini, d. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Jurnal Edumaspul, 6(1).
Mukti, W. B., & Setiyawan. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Rechstaat: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Muladi. (1992). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Bandung.
Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Nugraheni, H., Lestari, T. W., & Sukini. (2017). Mahasiswa Pelopor Gerakan Antikorupsi. Yogyakarta : Deepublish.
Prasetyo, R. T., Ma’ruf, U., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(4).
Priyatno, D. (2003 ). Kebijaksanaan Legeslasi Tentang Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Indonesia. Bandung: Utomo.
Purwono. (2008). Studi Kepustakaan. Info Persadha, 6(2).
Rachman, D. A., & Krisiandi. (2019, Maret 1). Perjalanan Kasus Bakamla, dari OTT KPK hingga Dijeratnya Korporasi. Retrieved from Kompas: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/03/01/21023141/perjalanan-kasus-bakamla-dari-ott-kpk-hingga-dijeratnya-korporasi?page=all
Rajamuddin, A. (2014). Tinjauan Kriminologi terhadap Timbulnya Kejahatan yang Diakibatkan oleh Pengaruh Minuman Keras di Kota Makassar . Jurnal Al-daulah.
Santoso, T., & Zulfa, E. A. (2010). Kriminologi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa.
Saputra, R. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi . Jurnal Cita Hukum, FSH UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta , 269-288.
Satria, H. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Sumber Daya Alam. Mimbar Hukum, 28(2), 288-300.
Setiyono. (2009). Kejahatan Korporasi Analisis Viktimologi dan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Malang: Bartyumedia.
Shanty, L. (2017). Aspek Teori Hukum dalam Kejahatan Korporasi. Pakuan Law Review, 3(1).
Shofte, Y. (2002). Pelaku Usaha, Konsumen Dan Tindak Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
Suhartati, Sahetapy, E. L., & Christianto, H. (2018). Buku Ajar: Anatomi Kejahatan Korporasi. Surabaya: PT Revka Petra Media.
Sumaryati, Suyadi, & Hastuti, D. (2019). Pendidikan Antikorupsi Dalam Keluarga, Sekolah, Dan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: UAD PRESS.
Tambunan, M. P. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Mimbar Keadilan, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 111-128 .
Tawalujan, J. (2012). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Lex Crimen, 1(3).
