Possibility of Implementing Digitization of Notarial Authentic Deeds as Electronic Evidence
Main
Putu Sinthya Alyandi*
Wayan Novy Purwanto
The aim of this article is to examine the usage of cyber notary, which has not been effective because of the vague standards surrounding the concept of cyber notary, including its definition and rules. Additionally, the article aims to assess the feasibility of incorporating cyber notary into traditional notary practices. The method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of this article are: First, there is a need for legal harmonization or re-actualization of rules between UUJN/UUJN-P and the ITE Law so that they can serve as a legal framework regulating the digitalization of authentic deeds, and notarial deeds can be categorized as valid electronic documents under the ITE Law. Second, the implementation of digitizing authentic notarial deeds is based on fulfilling legal needs in the notary sector, which extends beyond the formulation of rules regarding cyber notary to include the digitization of authentic deeds and notaries' obligations in executing cyber notary duties.
Afriana, A. (2020). Kedudukan Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Indonesia Terkait Akta Yang Dibuatnya Position and Responsibility of Notary As a Party To the Resolution of Civil Disputes in Indonesia Relating To the Deed. Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(2), 246–261.
Aryani, V. F., & Pulungan, M. S. (2021). Accountability of a Notary as a Land Deed Making Official for Misuse of Trust Related to Embezzlement of Certificates. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v24i2.285
Diatnika, D. G. A., & Mahendrayana, I. M. D. D. (2022). The Implementation Of The Legal Certainty Principle In Determining The Ability To Make Notarial Deeds Before A Notary. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(4), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i4.450
Girsang, W. F. E., Kurniawan, K., & Haq, L. M. H. (2024). Legal Validity of Notarial Deeds Signed With Electronic Signature: (Comparative Study between Indonesian Law and Australian Law). Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 3(1), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i1.927
Handoko, W. (2019). Dominasi Negara terhadap Profesi Notaris antara ide dan realitas. Roda Publika, Bogor.
Hendra, R. (2013). Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu Di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i01.1029
Irawan, A., Bakry, M. R., & Hardian, F. (2022). Eksistensi Aspek Teknologi Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik Secara Elektronik Pada Pengaturan Jabatan Notaris Di Era Industri 5.0. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(8), 1501–1521.
Mas Saraswati, D. N. C., & Yogantara S., P. (2024). The Urgency Of Attaching Fingerprints To The Deed Minutes In Relation To The Amendment Of The Notary Office Law. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 3(2), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i2.1234
Matra, A. F. (2012). Penerapan Cyber Notary di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Depok: Tesis Magister Kenotariatan FH UI.
Meilany, A. N. A. (2020). Cyber Notary: Protokol Notaris yang Disimpan Dalam Bentuk Elektronik. Pena Persada, Banyumas.
Nisa, N. Z. (2020). Aspek Legalitas Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notaris Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Civic Hukum, 5(2), 205–219.
Prabawa, I. G. N. W., & Rudy, D. G. (2020). Peran Notaris Dalam Pendirian Koperasi Setelah Diberlakukannya Online Single Submission. Jurnal Jatiswara, 33(2), 1–20.
Ramli, A. M. (2006). Cyberlaw dan HAKI dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Cet-2. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Septian, I. F., & Abdurahman, A. (2021). Status Hukum Penjelasan Undang-undang Berdasarkan Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(3), 803–826.
Yanti, N. K. P., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2024). The Urgency Of Electronic Registration Of Fiduciary Guarantees By Notary. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 3(3), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i3.1412
