Online Dispute Resolution Scheme over Consumer’s Loss as Consumer Protection in Cross-Border E-Commerce Transaction
Main Article Content
Zahwa Maulidina Afwija*
Consumers are facing greater risk of loss in cross-border e-commerce due to lack of thorough goods inspection, uncertainties in jurisdiction, and high costs of legal actions. However, current methods for resolving disputes are not effectively handling these issues. This research explores the urgency of implementing Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) to protect consumers in cross-border e-commerce transactions, focusing on Indonesia and the United Kingdom. As cross-border digital trade increases, consumers are increasingly vulnerable to losses due to limited inspection of goods, jurisdictional uncertainties, and the high cost of traditional litigation. Employing a normative legal research method with a comparative and conceptual approach, this study examines the regulatory framework governing e-commerce and dispute resolution in both jurisdictions. The findings reveal that although Indonesia’s legal system acknowledges alternative dispute resolution through instruments such as UUPK, UU ITE, and PP PMSE, it lacks detailed procedural regulations for effective ODR implementation. In contrast, the United Kingdom has established a comprehensive ODR system regulated by EU Regulations and Directives, offering structured online platforms for dispute resolution. The comparative analysis underscores the need for Indonesia to develop a specific legal framework for ODR that integrates substantive procedures, technological infrastructure, and institutional capacity. This would enable efficient, cost-effective, and accessible legal remedies for consumers engaging in cross-border e-commerce. The study contributes to the ongoing discourse on consumer protection reform and recommends regulatory harmonization to ensure legal certainty, transparency, and justice in digital trade environments.
Bahtiar, R. A. (2020). Potensi, peran pemerintah, dan tantangan dalam pengembangan e-commerce di Indonesia [Potency, government role, and challenges of e-commerce development in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(1), 13–25.
Barus, A., Chandra, T. Y., & Sinaulan, R. L. (2022). Analysis Of Debtor’s Efforts In Settlement Or Implementing Credit Obligations During The Non-Natural National Disasters Of The COVID-19 Pandemic. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.178
Born, G. B. (2020). International commercial arbitration. Wolters Kluwer.
Born, G., & Kalelioglu, C. (2021). Choice-of-law agreements in international contracts. Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L., 50, 44.
Damuri, Y. R. (2022). E-Commerce In Indonesia: The Rise Of Online Commerce And Its Impact On Firms’performance And Consumers. Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
European Commission. (2025). How the ODR Platform Works. https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/main/?event=main.home.howitworks
Haryono, N. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Berdasarkan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(2).
Howells, G., Twigg-Flesner, C., & Wilhelmsson, T. (2017). Rethinking EU consumer law. Taylor & Francis.
Jasmine, J., & Safrina, S. (2022). Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Cross Border E-Commerce. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan, 6(3), 359–370.
Kurniawan, K. (2012). Permasalahan dan Kendala Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Bpsk). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(1), 160–172.
Mania, K. (2015). Online dispute resolution: The future of justice. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 1(1), 76–86.
McLaughlin, K., & Perdana, A. (2010). Conflict and Dispute Resolution in Indonesia. Indonesia Social Development Paper, 16.
Poblet, M., & Ross, G. (2021). ODR in Europe. Rainey, D., Katsh, E. and Abdel Wahab, A.(2021). Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (2nd Ed.). Eleven Intl. Publishing.
Rafie, P. A., Merta, M. M., & Junaidi, J. (2023). Community Empowerment Strategies Through Mediation Technical Guidance In Land Dispute Resolution. Journal of Sustainable Community Service, 4(1), 88–99.
Riswandi, B. A. (2003). Hukum dan internet di Indonesia. UII Press.
Rodriguez, M. (2023). Introduction to Civil Law Systems. Routledge.
Rongiyati, S. (2019). Pelindungan konsumen dalam transaksi dagang melalui sistem elektronik. Negara Hukum, 10(1), 22.
Sander, F. E. A., & Goldberg, S. B. (2002). Introduction: Alternative Dispute Resolution. Harvard Law Review, 115(7), 1871–1893.
Sari, F. P., Setiawan, P. A. H., & Nurmawati, B. (2024). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. MEGA PRESS NUSANTARA.
Sari, M. I. (2019). Legal aspect of online arbitration in European Union and China. Law Review, 222–245.
Syafriana, R. (2016). Perlindungan konsumen dalam transaksi elektronik. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 430–447.
Yang, J., & Papazoglou, M. P. (2000). Interoperation support for electronic business. Communications of the ACM, 43(6), 39–47.
