Protecting Satellite Telecommunication by Limiting the Use of Anti-Satellite Weapons Under International Space Law
Main Article Content
Kania Maharani
Aktieva Tri Tjitrawati
Sinar Aju Wulandari*
The increasing utilization of outer space has brought about unprecedented opportunities and potential security challenges. The development of anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons has raised concerns about the militarization of space and the potential for conflict. This research examines the legal framework governing ASAT weapons under international space law, focusing on the Outer Space Treaty (OST) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio Regulations. It analyzes the limitations of existing legal instruments in addressing the threats posed by ASATs, particularly their potential to generate space debris and disrupt critical satellite infrastructure. This research adopts normative (doctrinal) legal methods by incorporating statutes and conceptual frameworks to analyze primary and secondary legal sources in order to investigate legal standards regarding militarization and disarmament in space. This research highlight that the current legal framework is insufficient to prevent the proliferation and use of ASAT weapons and proposes the development of a new international treaty specifically addressing ASATs. This treaty would provide clearer definitions, stricter regulations, and stronger enforcement mechanisms to ensure the long-term sustainability and security of space activities. This research also explores the role of the ITU in promoting the peaceful and responsible use of outer space through its Radio Regulations and technical expertise. The findings emphasize the need for greater cooperation between the ITU and other international organizations to address the challenges posed by ASAT weapons and ensure the continued benefits of space technology for all humankind.
Crane, L. (2021). Anti-satellite weapons. New Scientist, 252(3362), 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(21)02103-5
G.W, R. C., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Negara Peluncur Atas Kerugian Benda Antariksa Berdasarkan Liability Convention 1972. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4(1).
Jones, M. (2016). Star Wars: ‘Spoofing’, anti-satellite weapons and conflict in space. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/star-wars-spoofing-anti-satellite-weapons-conflict-space
Kerrest, A. (2011). Outer Space as International Space: Lessons from Antarctica. In Science diplomacy : science, Antarctica, and the governance of international spaces. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.9781935623069.133
Koplow, D. A. (2009). Death by moderation: The U.S. Military’s quest for useable weapons. In Death by Moderation: The U.S. Military’s Quest for Useable Weapons. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804816
Lachs, M. (2010). The Law of Outer Space: An Experience in Contemporary Law- making. Martijnus Nijhoff Publishers.
Marinich, V. K., & Myklush, M. I. (2023). Space Law, Subjects and Jurisdictions: pre-1963 period. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 4. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.90
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Kencana Pranada.
Mastalir, A. J. (2009). US Response to China’s ASAT Test: An International Security Space Alliance for the Future. Air University Press.
NASA. (2023). What Is a Satellite? NASA. https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/satellite/en/
Neto, O. de O. B. (2015). Defining the limits of outer space for regulatory purposes. Springer.
Ouda, H. A. (2015). Results-based systems are the path towards results-oriented government. International Journal on Governmental Financial Management, 15(1), 46–69.
Raju, N. (2021). A Proposal For A Ban On Destructive Anti-Satellite Testing: A Role For The European Union? Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Papers, 74.
Vlasic, I. A. (1967). The Space Treaty: A Preliminary Evaluation. California Law Review, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/3479358
