Analysis of Fiduciary Guarantee Items Transmitted by Debtors from a Legal Perspective
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Dahris Siregar*
The demand for finance rises in tandem with the expansion of development activities, and the majority of the money required to satisfy these needs may be acquired through borrowing and borrowing activities, one of which is through financial institutions' services. This study aims to determine the status of the debtor transferred in accordance with the terms of the agreement, ac-cording to the fiduciary guarantee object. and to find out about the credit settlement attempts that the debtor made. Normative juridical research methodology is employed in the scientific study of fiduciary guarantee law. The study's findings indicate that in order to ascertain the legal standing of the fiduciary guarantee object that the debtor transferred, registration is necessary. This gives the creditor legal certainty regarding the fiduciary guarantee object's legal position, and negotiations with the debtor and other parties who consent to the transfer of the fiduciary guarantee object are used to carry out credit settlement activities. The result shows that because the fiduciary guarantee object transmitted by the debtor only registers a portion of the fiduciary promise, it has a weak legal standing, allowing the debtor to transfer the unregistered fiduciary guarantee object. In an attempt to replace the collateral that was transferred to a third party with an item that belongs to the debtor and has a value equal to the transferred collateral, creditors have applied dispute resolution through a non-litigation settlement method that involves negotiation and mediation between the parties.
Afandi, F. (2023). Penyelesaian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Yang Objeknya Dialihkan Oleh Debitur. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i1.2251
Alfitra, D. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Penghapusan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Secara Elektronik. Recital Review, 3(1), 120–147.
Bela, S., & Raffles, R. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Terhadap Kreditur Terkait Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Benda Persediaan Di Kota Jambi. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 2(3), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v2i3.15991
Boham, H. W., Tawas, F., & Tinangon, E. N. (2024). Permasalahan Dan Regulasi Mengenai Praktik Penagihan Utang Oleh Debt Collector. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, UNSRAT, 12(5), 1–13.
Daming, S., & Stindyana, K. (2022). Tinjauan Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Keberadaan Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Leasing Kepemilikan Kendaraan Bermotor. Yustisi, 8(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v8i2.6668
Fitrian, L., & Aslami, I. F. (2024). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Di Alihkan Oleh Debitur ( Studi Pt . Pegadaian. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 8(9), 504–511.
Hanim, L., Chalim, M. A., & Noorman, M. S. (2023). The Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees after Constitutional Court Decision No . 2 / PUU-XIX / 2021. Jurnalakta, 10(1), 45–60.
Haroen, R. A. (2022). Legal Protection for Debtors in the Implementation of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects Execution After the Enactment of the Constitutional Court Verdict No . 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019. Legal Brief, 11(4), 2587–2594.
Hedistira, D., & Pujiyono. (2020). Kepemilikan dan Penguasaan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Terjadi Sengketa Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Privat Law, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40372
Lubis, M. A., & Harahap, M. Y. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Sebagai Pemegang Hak Jaminan dalam Perkara Debitur Wanprestasi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(2), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.4.2.7834.337-343
Markum, M., Widhiyanti, H. N., & Widiarto, A. E. (2021). Legal Consequences of Fiduciary Guarantee Execution Post Decision of Indonesian Constitutional Court. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(8), 218. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i8.2892
Nurmelinda, M. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia. Jurnal Yustitia, 1645, 1–76.
Panjukang, T., Zulkarnain Hanafi, & Ibnu Subarkah. (2025). Legal Analysis Of The Taking Of Fiduciary Objects By Debt Collectors Of Financial Institutions In Malang. Widya Gama Law Review, 2(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.31328/wglr.v2i1.706
Sadewa, R. D., Daim, N. A., & Ismono, J. (2023). Legal Protection of Recipients of Fiduciary Guarantees for Supply Goods With Delivery Orders as Proof of Ownership of Collateral Goods. Journal Master of Laws “Law and Humanity,” 176–191.
Satory, A., Ahmad, S. D., & Nugraha, R. S. (2024). Fiduciary Guarantee Registration Implementation Through Electronic (Online System) in Indonesia. Jurnal Akta, 11(4), 1337. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i4.41689
Siregar, D. (2025). Hukum Jaminan (A. Rasyid (ed.)). PT Dewangga Energi Internasional.
Utami, P. D., Lianti, L., Nadhilah, F. H., & Kirani, A. (2021). Legal Uncertainty In Fiduciary Guarantee Law : An Analysis Of Reality And Its Impact On Creditors. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 8(1), 20–33.
Viswari, V. S., O’leary, N. H., & Arini, D. G. D. (2021). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Antara Bank dan Nasabah Melalui Mediasi di BPR Werdhi Sedana Gianyar. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 3(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.2.2021.201-205
Wilianita, A., Rahmatiar, Y., & Abas, M. (2024). Akibat Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Secara Elektronik (Online) Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(6), 2799–2811. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2703
Winarno, J. I. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Selaku Bagi Penerima Fidusia Dan Pemberi Fidusia Dalam Akta Notarial. Lex Administratum, XI(2), 3.
Zulfikar, R. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dirampasnya Objek Jaminan Dalam Perkara Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art3
