Juridical Analysis of the Rejection of Judicial Review (PK) in the Case of PT Mas Murni Indonesia, Tbk (in Bankruptcy): A Review of Supreme Court Decision No. 21 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025
Main Article Content
Sheren Michi Tjandra*
Claureria Angie Ely
Angelica Angelica
Udin Silalahi
Joy Zaman Felix Saragih
Judicial Review is an extraordinary legal remedy designed to uphold legal certainty and justice in civil cases, including bankruptcy proceedings. This paper examines the application of Judicial Review in the bankruptcy case of PT Mas Murni Indonesia, Tbk, based on Supreme Court Decision No. 21 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025. The study emphasizes the role of PK as a corrective mechanism against final and binding decisions, as well as the legal reasoning employed by the judges in reaching their verdict. PK in bankruptcy cases carries distinct characteristics, as it involves balancing the rights of creditors and debtors while ensuring legal certainty within the business sphere. The scope of PK is strictly limited by statutory provisions, particularly Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) and Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power. This research adopts a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches, utilizing primary legal materials on bankruptcy and extraordinary remedies. Qualitative analysis reveals that despite its limited scope, PK plays a significant role in correcting misapplications of law with substantive justice implications. In the case of PT Mas Murni Indonesia, Tbk, the Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of balancing legal certainty with fairness and utility. Accordingly, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamics of Judicial Review in bankruptcy cases and illustrates how Indonesian judicial practice strives to achieve justice in line with the ultimate purpose of law.
Alfalah, M. F., & Kristiyadi, K. (2023). Analisis Pertimbangan Dikabulkannya Peninjauan Kembali pada Perkara Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor: 237/PK/Pid.Sus/2020). Verstek, 11(4), 554.
Alfret, A. (2023). Peninjauan Kembali Demi Keadilan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 53(3), 391–406.
Amboro, F. Y. P. (2022). Pengaturan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Amerika Serikat Dan Inggris. Lex Prudentium Law Journal, 1(2), 62–81.
Ellshaday, Z. C., & Sawitri, D. A. D. (2025). Analisis Konsep Keadaan Baru Sebagai Rasio Untuk Melakukan Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(4).
Febrina, W., & Pramono, N. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Konversi Utang Menjadi Saham (Debt to Equity Swap) dalam Rangka Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Studi Kasus Putusan Pembatalan Perubahan Perjanjian Perdamaian pada PT Arpeni Pratama Ocean Line, Tbk.). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Helena, I. A. P. D., & Kartika, I. G. A. P. (2024). Curator’s Legal Efforts Against Bankruptcy Estate (Boedel) Assets Seized in Criminal Confiscation of Corruption Cases. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 3(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i2.1096
Mahmudah, S. (2023). Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Homologasi Dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Pancasakti Law Journal (PLJ), 1(1), 107–116.
Munawaroh. (2024). Arti Asas Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-res-judicata-pro-veritate-habetur-lt5301326f2ef06/
Pratama, G. A., Zainab, N., & Siswanto, H. (2023). Legal Remedies Against Bankruptcy Decision Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 23/PUU-XIX/2021. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(2), 216–230.
Rachman, R. (2021). Penerapan “Asas Keadilan” Dalam Sengketa Kepailitan Dalam Rangka Melindungi Kepentingan Debitur (Studi Putusan: Nomor 44PK/PDT. SUS-Pailit/2016).
Rusadi, A. (2023). Aksesibilitas Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Perdata Yang Kedua. Badamai Law Journal, 8(1), 219–236.
Sofia, A. N. (2019). Kedudukan Hak Suara Kreditor Preferen dalam Persetujuan Rencana Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.
Subekti, R. (1991). Hukum pembuktian. Pradnya Paramita.
Terok, G. T. A. (2022). Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Dalam Perkara Kepailitan. LEX PRIVATUM, 10(2).
Tilaar, P. (2025). Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Oleh Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. LEX PRIVATUM, 16(1).
Usman, M. Z., Rahman, S., & Hamzah, Y. A. (2025). Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 8 PK/Pdt. Sus-Pailit/2024. LEGAL DIALOGICA, 1(1).
Wantu, F. M., Nggilu, N. M., Dungga, W. A., & Ismail, D. E. (2023). Simple Evidence of Bankruptcy Cases in Court Based on Ius Constituendum of Civil Procedural Law. Russian Law Journal, 11(2), 126–134.
Yadnya, P. A. K., & Pradana, I. G. M. O. P. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Upaya Hukum Luar Biasa Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Sistem Hukum Acara Pidana. JIS SIWIRABUDA, 1(2), 172–178.
Zaid, M., Musa, M., & Asmarasari, B. (2025). ’Novum’in Indonesian Criminal Justice: Problems and Legal Reform. Indonesian Journal of Crime and Criminal Justice, 1(1), 55–88.
Zekos, G. I. (2021). E-Globalization and Digital Economy. In Economics and Law of Artificial Intelligence: Finance, Economic Impacts, Risk Management and Governance (pp. 13–66). Springer.
