THE PROBLEM OF CORRUPTION LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT CAUSES STATE LOSSES SINCE THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 25 / PUU-XIV / 2016 DECISION
Main
Muhammad Zaki*
Tofik Y Chandra2
Hedwig Adianto Mau
are increasingly widespread, so that the boundaries of the characteristics of acts of corruption and the characteristics of acts that are not corrupt but characterized by very detrimental to the state and society become difficult to distinguish, and lead to uncertainty about how to formulate groups. his crime. This research is a normative legal research that uses primary and secondary legal sources with library research collection techniques through legislation approach, historical approach and case approach. The results obtained are the legal considerations of the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 25/PUU/XIV/2016 in Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption in Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016 which grants the abolition of the phrase “can” is to create legal certainty for the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) regarding discretionary policies or decisions or the implementation of the Ermessen freies principle which is criminalized as a criminal act of corruption because it is detrimental to state finances.
Ali, A., & Heryani, W. (2012). Sosiologi Hukum: Kajian Empiris Terhadap Pengadilan, cet. Pertama, Kencana, Jakarta.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-pokok hukum tata negara Indonesia pasca reformasi. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Chazawi, A. (2005). Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia.
Danil, E. (2021). Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana Dan Pemberantasannya-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Fathuddin, F. (2015). Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dugaan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang) Pejabat Publik (Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3(1), 95370.
Fatkhurohman, F., & Kurniawan, N. (2017). Pergeseran Delik Korupsi dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(1), 1–21.
Handoko, D. (2015). Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Hawa Dan Ahwa.
Hermien, Tri, & Sukini. (2017). Mahasiswa pelopor gerakan antikorupsi. Deepublish.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Delardi, E., Irwansyah, A., Bascara, D., Ansori, B., & Tanjung, F. (2022). The Eradication Of Corruption And The Enforcement Of The Law In Indonesia As Seen Through The Lens Of Legal Philosophy. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 1–8.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Fransisca, Z., Ritonga, F., Pardede, D. J., Almas, S., Sikumbang, N. A., Mutiara, Khoiriyah, A., Hamizah, S., Malahayati, & Suryadi. (2022). Understanding And Describing Relationship Of State Law And Human Right. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business (JHSSB), 1(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v1i1.63
Kansil, C. S. T. (1989). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Cet. Ke-7. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Ridwan, H. R. (2014). Hukum Administrasi Negara Edisi Revisi. Jakarta. Rajagrafindo Perkasa.
Soerjono, S. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Suratman, P. D., & Dillah, P. (2014). Metode penelitian hukum. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutiyoso, B. (2008). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pencari Keadilan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 15(3), 352–372.
Utrecht, E., & Mohammad, S. D. (1962). Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia, Cet. Ichtiar, Jakarta, 23.
Yuntho, E., Sari, I. D. A., Limbong, J., Bakar, R., & Ilyas, F. (2014). Penerapan unsur merugikan keuangan negara dalam delik tindak pidana korupsi.
