The Existence of the Lex Certa Principle in the Construction of the Crime of Illicit Enrichment in the Criminal Law System of Timor-Leste
Main Article Content
Aderito Antonio Pinto Tilman*
I Wayan Rideng
Ni Komang Arini Styawati
A core tenet of criminal law is the principle of legality, which dictates that no conduct is punishable without a pre-existing legal prohibition (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege). This concept, codified in Article 1(1) of the Timorese Penal Code, forms the bedrock of the nation’s legal framework, ensuring predictability in the law and the protection of fundamental human rights. With the ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption/UNCAC 2003 by the Timor-Leste Government in 2009, and the National Parliament has criminalized Illicit Enrichment as a criminal act of corruption in its national law. However, in the formulation of illicit enrichment, there are norms that are unclear, vague and give rise to interpretation in law enforcement. The unclear formulation of the law, lex certa will create legal uncertainty for the community due to ambiguity. This study aims to analyze the existence of the lex certa principle in the theory of the principle of legality towards Illicit Enrichment, and how its implications in application, in order to build a strong legal system. Using a library research method, this study examines relevant legal, conceptual, and expert opinions. The results indicate that illicit enrichment cannot be implemented in Timor-Leste due to unclear, vague, and ambiguous formulations of the norm, as well as conflicts with the Timor-Leste Constitution. In conclusion, the study recommends clarifying and precisely defining illicit enrichment provisions to comply with the lex certa principle, ensuring legal certainty, effective enforcement, and alignment with constitutional norms.
Ahmad, A. (2025). Analysis of abuse of authority by government apparatus in the state administrative legal system. International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law, 1(1), 69–83.
Arif, B. N. (2002). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Kencana.
Ariman, R., & Raghib, F. (2016). Hukum Pidana. Setara Press.
Atmadja, I. D. G. (2010). Hukum Konstitusi: Problematika Konstitusi Indonesia Sesudah Perubahan UUD Negara Republik Indonesia 1945. Setara Press.
Beard, C. A. (2012). The Supreme Court and the constitution. Courier Corporation.
Boot, M. (2002). Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes: Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Intersentia.
Chazawi, A. (2010). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1: Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Diantha, I. M. P., & Made, I. (2017). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Gofar, F. A. (2005). Asas legalitas dalam rancangan KUHP 2005. ELSAM.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2009). Asas Legalitas dan Penemuan Hukum dalam Hukum Pidana. Erlangga.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2014). Asas Legalitas dan Perkembangannya dalam Hukum Pidana. Pelatihan Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, UGM.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana (Revisi). Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Ilyas, A. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKAP Indonesia.
Kantjai, M. M. (2016). Pasal 335 Ayat (1) ke-1 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dari Aspek Lex Certa pada Asas Legalitas. Lex Crimen, 5(1), 28–36. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/10598
Kelsen, H. (2011). General Theory Of Law and State, diterjemahkan oleh Rasisul Muttaqien. Nusa Media.
Loqman, L. (1992). Tentang Tindak Pidana dan Beberapa Hal Penting dalam Hukum Pidana. TP.
Marpaung, L. (2005). Asas-asas teori praktik hukum pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Moeljatno. (1984). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara.
Muladi. (2002). Demokrasi, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Reformasi di Indonesia. Habibie Center.
Prakoso, A. (2016). Penemuan Hukum: Sistem, Metode, Aliran dan Prosedur dalam Menemukan Hukum. LaksBang Pressindo.
Putri, S. B. S. R. W. (2024). Analisis Teori Tujuan Hukum Gustav Radbruch dalam Kedudukan Majelis Penyelesaian Perselisihan Medis dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. SANGAJI : Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 8(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v8i2.3463
Remmelink, J., & Moeliono, T. P. (2003). Hukum Pidana: Komentar atas Pasal-pasal Terpenting dari KUHP Belanda dan Padanannya dalam KUHP Indonesia. Gramedia Pusaka Utama.
Saleh, R. (1981). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dengan Penjelasan. Aksara Baru.
Santoso, T. (2021). Hukum Pidana : Suatu Pengantar. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sianturi, S. R. (1986). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Alumni; AHAEM-PETEHAEM.
Sudarto. (1990). Hukum Pidana I. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Sunggono, B. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Pradnya Paramita.
Sutedi, A. (2008). Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Weber, F., Goodwin, M., & Faure, M. (2014). The Regulator’s Dilemma: Caught Between the Need for Flexibility & the Demands of Foreseeability Reassessing the Lex Certa Principle. Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology, 24(3), 283–364. https://www.albanylawscitech.org/article/19236-the-regulator-s-dilemma-caught-between-the-need-for-flexibility-the-demands-of-foreseeability-reassessing-the-lex-certa-principle
Yuherawan, D. S. B. (2014). Dekonstruksi Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana. Setara Press.
Yunas, D. N. (1992). Konsepsi Negara Hukum. Angkasa Raya.
