The Gap Between Service Excellence and Procedural Justice in Criminal Investigation Services at the West Jakarta Metro Police
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Muhammad Rizky Ali Akbar
Agus Sumartomo*
Within the criminal justice system, investigative services serve as a critical arena where police legitimacy is shaped through citizens’ direct experiences, yet gaps between administrative compliance and public expectations often trigger dissatisfaction. This study aims to identify the implementation of service excellence in the criminal investigation process at the Criminal Investigation Unit (Satreskrim) of the West Jakarta Metro Police, to analyze complainants’ experiences of procedural justice, and to explain the gap between administrative service standards and public experience that may trigger complaints (Dumas). A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through semi-structured interviews with 13 informants (investigators and complainants), document review, and observation. The findings indicate that while the unit demonstrates strong administrative compliance with standard operating procedures and criminal procedural law, a significant gap remains in interaction and communication between investigators and complainants. Within the A6 service excellence framework, ability and internal accountability function relatively well, whereas action and external accountability remain weak, particularly in inconsistent delivery of case progress updates and limited explanation of investigation delays. From a procedural justice perspective, this condition reduces complainants’ perceptions of trustworthiness and respect. This study concludes that Dumas is more often triggered by lack of process clarity (process-related complaints) than by dissatisfaction with case outcomes alone. Accordingly, improving investigative services requires enhancing the readability of case progress through scheduled, consistent, and substantive communication to strengthen procedural transparency and public trust.
Andrian, A., & Sari, P. N. (2024). The Impact Of Excellent Service And Security Management On Public Interest In Visiting Local Government Offices In The East Bekasi Region, Bekasi City. Ekombis Review: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 12(2), 1979–1988. https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v12i2.5324
Aziz, M. A. (2023). Strategi Penanganan Pengaduan Masyarakat (Dumas) Guna Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Anggota Polri. Jurnal Litbang Polri, 26(3), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.46976/litbangpolri.v26i3.224
Brata, A. A. (2023). Dasar‑Dasar Pelayanan Prima. Elex Media Komputindo.
Campbell, K., Orr, E., Durepos, P., Nguyen, L., Li, L., Whitmore, C., Gehrke, P., Graham, L., & Jack, S. (2021). Reflexive Thematic Analysis for Applied Qualitative Health Research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5010
Cohen, G., & Headley, A. M. (2023). Training and ‘Doing’ Procedural Justice in the Frontline of Public Service: Evidence from Police. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 44(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x221149137
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge.
Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Ugm Press.
Ginting, A. (2024). The Optimization of Investigation by Satreskrim Polres Boyolali in Discovering Criminal Actions of Fraud through Electronic Media. Tanggon Kosala, 12(2), 661–746. https://doi.org/10.70526/tk.v12i2.1191
Janssen, A. A. A., van den Bos, K., & van der Kraats, K. G. F. (2025). “I do not have an opinion about that yet”: Qualitative research on perceived procedural justice of self-represented litigants in early stages of small claims procedures in the Netherlands. Law and Human Behavior, 49(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000612
Kuen, K. (2024). Reassessing the process-based model: Do procedural justice and police legitimacy lead to reporting neighborhood problems to the police over time? Journal of Criminal Justice, 95, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102290
Manda, R. P., & Halimah, H. (2025). Optimization of Sp2hp in Improving Law Enforcement Transparency in Satreskrim Polrestabes Medan. Litercay: International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 4(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i1.2022
Meyerson, D., Mackenzie, C., & MacDermott, T. (2020). Procedural Justice and Relational Theory: Empirical, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge.
Murphy, K. (2021). The Empirical Study of Procedural Justice Policing in Australia: Highlights and Challenges. In Procedural Justice and Relational Theory (1st ed.). Routledge.
Perez-Vincent, S. M., & Puebla, D. (2024). Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: Evidence from a Vignette Experiment in Central America. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0013056
Porter, L. E., & Prenzler, T. (2017). Police officer gender and excessive force complaints: an Australian study. Policing and Society, 27(8), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1114616
Radburn, M., & Stott, C. (2018). The social psychological processes of ‘procedural justice’: Concepts, critiques and opportunities. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818780200
Tyler, T. R., Goff, P. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2015). The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791
Wood, G., Tyler, T., Papachristos, A. V, Roth, J., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Revised findings for “Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers.” Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xf32m
Worden, R. E., & McLean, S. J. (2017). Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy (1st ed.). University of California Press.
Yesberg, J. A., Sargeant, E., Fenn, L., Murphy, K., & Madon, N. (2024). Fairness in policing: how does internal procedural justice translate to external procedural justice? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae126
Yin, R. K. (2019). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode (M. D. Mudzakir (ed.); 16th ed.). Rajawali Pers.
