Reconstructing the Legal Architecture of Crypto Asset Issuance Regulation in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Aloysius Bernanda Gunawan*
Adi Nur Rohman
M.S. Tumanggor
Indonesia's crypto asset ecosystem has grown substantially, ranking sixth globally in adoption, yet its regulatory architecture for crypto asset issuance remains fragmented and inadequately defined. This study examines the evolutionary trajectory of Indonesia's issuance-related regulatory framework, tracing the shift from the commodity-based positive-list regime under Surat Keputusan (SK) Bappebti Number 13 of 2022, through the transition to financial sector governance under Peraturan OJK (POJK) Number 27 of 2024, and the subsequent amendments introduced by POJK Number 23 of 2025. Employing a normative juridical method with comparative law and statutory approaches, this study benchmarks Indonesia's framework against the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 currently the most comprehensive issuance-specific crypto asset law globally. The analysis reveals six critical regulatory gaps in Indonesia's issuance regime, including the absence of a formal white paper obligation, the lack of pre-issuance issuer authorization, no technical due diligence mandates, and an inadequate disclosure liability framework. In response, this article proposes a Three-Gate Regulatory Architecture Model comprising Gate I (Registration and White Paper Validation), Gate II (Technical Due Diligence), and Gate III (OJK Approval and License Issuance), complemented by transitional provisions for existing assets. This model represents a legally grounded and proportionate reconstruction of Indonesia's crypto asset issuance regulation, aligned with international best practices while respecting Indonesia's regulatory sovereignty.
Biro Humas Kementerian Perdagangan. (2022). Bappebti Terbitkan Perba Penetapan Daftar Aset Kripto yang Diperdagangkan di Pasar Fisik Aset Kripto. In Siaran Pers.
Burilov, V. (2019). Regulation of Crypto Tokens and Initial Coin Offerings in the EU: De lege lata and de lege ferenda. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 6(2), 146–186. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00602003
Chainalysis Team. (2024). The 2024 Global Adoption Index: Central & Southern Asia and Oceania (CSAO) Region Leads the World in Terms of Global Cryptocurrency Adoption. Chainalysis. https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2024-global-crypto-adoption-index/
De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard University Press.
Ferreira, A., & Sandner, P. (2021). Eu search for regulatory answers to crypto assets and their place in the financial markets’ infrastructure. Computer Law and Security Review, 43, 105632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105632
Hacker, P., & Thomale, C. (2018). Crypto-securities regulation: ICOs, token sales and cryptocurrencies under EU financial law. European Company and Financial Law Review, 15(4), 645–696. https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0021
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia: sebauh studi tentang Prinsip-prinsipnya. Bina Ilmu.
Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi 2005. Kencana, Jakarta.
Maume, P., & Fromberger, M. (2018). Regulation of Initial Coin Offerings: Reconciling US and EU Securities Laws. Chicago Journal of International Law, 19(2), 548–585. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200037
Mulyana, S. P., Sumaragatha, I. G. B. S., & Evangelista, B. (2025). Urgensi Integrasi Kewenangan OJK dan Bappebti dalam Pengaturan Investasi Aset Kripto di Indonesia. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 6(1), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v6i1.356
Perdana, A., & Jhee Jiow, H. (2024). Crypto-Cognitive Exploitation: Integrating Cognitive, Social, and Technological perspectives on cryptocurrency fraud. Telematics and Informatics, 95, 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102191
Peryanto, J., Ria Napitupulu, D. W., Saragi, P., Penelitian, A., & Kunci, K. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengguna Cryptocurrency Menurut UU No. 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang P2SK. Legal Protection for Cryptocurrency Users According to Law No. 4 of 2023 Concerning P2SK. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(5), 2432–2446. https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/index.php/JKS
Pratama, M. R. Y., Muriman, C., & Nita, S. (2025). Establishing the Legal Basis for Crypto Asset Confiscation: A Critical Study on the Challenges of Cybercrime Law Enforcement in Indonesia. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 4(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v4i2.1679
Shidarta, S. (2006). Pemetaan kelembagaan perlindungan konsumen. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 24(1).
Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & FFhr, L. (2018). The ICO Gold Rush: It’s a Scam, It’s a Bubble, It’s a Super Challenge for Regulators. Harvard International Law Journal, 63(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072298
