A Legal Analysis of Self-Defense (Noodweer) in Criminal Assault Cases

Alfredo Rynaldi; Hadina Rivaldi Diaz; Angga Hendrawinangun

doi:10.55047/polri.v5i3.2309

A Legal Analysis of Self-Defense (Noodweer) in Criminal Assault Cases

Alfredo Rynaldi*

Hadina Rivaldi Diaz

Angga Hendrawinangun

Keywords: Assault Criminal Liability Criminal Law Noodweer exces

The application of self-defense (noodweer) in assault cases remains a controversial issue in Indonesian criminal law, particularly regarding the limits of justified defensive actions and criminal liability in spontaneous multi-party conflicts. This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of the parties involved and examine the applicability of noodweer and noodweer exces under the Indonesian Criminal Code. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials consist of Articles 49 and 351 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, supported by secondary legal materials, including legal doctrines, scholarly literature, and recent studies. The collected legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through descriptive-analytical methods. The findings indicate that A acted as the initial aggressor by initiating and continuing unlawful violence against B and C. Although B's act of striking A with a wooden object formally fulfills the elements of assault, it may be justified as noodweer or alternatively categorized as noodweer exces. Meanwhile, C's intervention is solely aimed at preventing further violence and therefore does not constitute a criminal offense. The study emphasizes the importance of contextual interpretation, proportionality, and defense of others in determining criminal liability.

Ali, M. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.

Andini, S. N. A. S. N., Dijayanti, T., Fadilah, S., Septhianova, S. S., & Maskanah, U. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Tindakan Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) oleh Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2(02). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/755

Arief, B. N. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Fatimah, F., Hatta, M., & Rahman, A. (2025). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer Exces) Yang Melampaui Batas Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Nomor 33/Pid.B/2024/PN.BIR). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v8i3.23541

Fauzi, M., & Zuhri, A. (2025). Noodweer Exces in Self-Defense Perspective Positive Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law. LEGAL BRIEF, 13(6), 1598–1609. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i6.1223

Gayatri, D., & Darmadi, A. A. (2025). Noodweer Exces Sebagai Alasan Pemaaf: Mencegah Kriminalisasi Korban Dalam Hukum Pidana. Kertha Negara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(4), 1653–1668.

Hamzah, A. (2010). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Huda, C. (2015). Dari’Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan’, Menuju’Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan’. Kencana.

Labibah, B. S., & Mahardhika, V. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Pembelaan Terpaksa Yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) Pada Pasal 49 Ayat (2) KUHP Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Putusan Nomor 33/Pid. B/2024/PN Bir). Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Law, 1(2), 1–11. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/ijcl/article/view/42295

Mardhatillah, S. I., Huda, M. N., & Idham, R. (2024). Implications of the Noodweer Excess Approach in Excessive Self-Defense with the Integration of Philosophy and Law. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 6(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25559

Nugroho, F. S., Isnaini, E., & Sofyan, M. R. (2024). Legal Review of the Defense of Forced Excess (Noodweer Exces) in the Crime of Assault in Decision No. 4/Pid.B/2024/PN JNP. Jurnal Independent, 12(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v12i2.334

Prochorus, L. A., & Tjoneng, A. (2025). Penerapan Pasal 49 KUHP Terkait dengan Pembelaan Terpaksa dalam Kasus Kejahatan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(4), 3287–3299. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4450

Putri, K. A., & Kuswandi. (2026). Implementation of Compulsory Defence In The Indonesian Criminal Justice System: A Normative Analysis and Study of Court Decisions. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 3(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v3i2.5273

Remmelink, J., & Moeliono, T. P. (2003). Hukum Pidana: Komentar atas Pasal-pasal Terpenting dari KUHP Belanda dan Padanannya dalam KUHP Indonesia. Gramedia Pusaka Utama.

Santoso, T. (2023). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rajawali Pers.

Saputra, U., Hasibuan, E. S., & Samosir, M. (2026). Penerapan Unsur Mens Rea Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berbasis Kebijakan Publik: Studi Kasus Tom Lembong. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu, 3(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.69714/bsv3jt44

Sherliantie, D. A., Pura, M. H., & Fadlian, A. (2022). Restorative Justice against the Crimes of Murder based on Noodweer and Noodweer Exces. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 7(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v7i2.37323

Sibero, S. M. T., Kristiawanto, K., & Ismed, M. (2024). Criminal Law Enforcement In Efforts To Eradicate Money Laundering In Indonesia. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 3(4), 467–471. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i4.1461

Sidabutar, B., Seftiniara, I. N., & Hartono, B. (2026). The Accountability for Self-Defense (Noodweer) in a Ruling on Assault Resulting in Severe Injury (Case Study of Decision Number 76/Pid. B/2025/PN TJK). TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 5(1), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v5i1.1591

Simons, K. W. (2008). Self-Defense: Reasonable Beliefs or Reasonable Self-Control? New Criminal Law Review, 11(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2008.11.1.51

Tongat. (2003). Hukum Pidana Materiil Tinjauan Atas Tindak Pidana terhadap Subjek hokum dalam KUHP. Djambatan.

Wafi, A., & Firmansyah, H. (2025). Self-Defense in Criminal Law: Examining Limitations and Implications for Criminal Liability. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 8(2), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.12072

Zumaroh, S. N. U., & Rusdiana, E. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Pasal 49 KUHP terkait Pembelaan Terpaksa dalam Studi Putusan Nomor 115/Pid.B/2021/PN Stb. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 10(2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v10i2.13401