Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Imposing Decisions on Immoral Crimes Against Children and implementation of decisions related to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection Article 81 Paragraph (2). The purpose of this paper is to analyze the judge's considerations in deciding cases of immoral crimes against children. This research method uses an empirical juridical approach which is carried out by interviewing several respondents or related sources. The results of the study show that when judges are deciding on criminal cases involving children, they take into account both items that charge and things that relieve the issue. However, the implementation of the verdicts in criminal cases involving children is carried out in line with the Operational Standards of General Criminal Procedure, as well as with the Children's Criminal Justice System. There are three different types of decisions that can be made under the provisions of the KUHAP, namely: court decisions in the form of a judgment (Veroordeling), court decisions in the form of a redeeving of all charges (Vrijspraak), and court decisions in the form of freedom from all forms of law (Onslag van all rechtsvervolging).