CORPORATIONS AS WHISTLEBLOWERS IN THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION BASED ON THE ELECTRONIC AND TRANSACTION INFORMATION ACT
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Dwikarunia Setiawan Guntik*
Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
The purpose of writing this article is to find out whether the corporation can be a reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law. The methods performed in writing this article are normative legal research methods that use a type of statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the regulation of defamation crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code and ITE Law, corporations cannot be the reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law because based on letter a guidelines for the implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of SkB No. 2/VI/2021 on guidelines for the implementation of the ITE Law stipulate that the understanding of the content of insults and / or defamation must refer to the provisions of Article 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code in addition to letter f The implementation guidelines of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law stipulates that victims who can become whistleblowers are only individuals with a specific identity so that corporations cannot be reporting parties under the ITE Law. Corporations cannot be the reporting party should be included in the article explanation to be binding in an arrangement because the nature of the DECREE containing implementation guidelines is only binding on law enforcement only.
Andrianto. (2013). Menguji Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jurnal Yuridika , 3(28).
Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum.
Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2019). Perkembangan Pengaturan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti.
Hendrawan, M. B., Syahrin, A., Ginting, B., & Mulyadi, M. (2015). Hubungan antara Kesengajaan terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas di Jalan yang Menyebabkan Hilangnya Nyawa Orang Seseorang. USU Law Journal, 3(1), 56–73.
Maskun, S. H. (2013). Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime) Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta, Kencana.
Nasution, E. S. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Mercatoria, 8(2), 132–144.
Ningrum, H. W. (2018). Sejarah dan Perkembangan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 1(2), 139–156.
PRIYATNO, D. R. D., & SH, M. H. (2020). Pertanggung jawaban pidana korporasi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Samudra, A. H. (2020). Pencemaran Nama Baik Dan Penghinaan Melalui Media Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UU ITE. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(1), 91–105.
Supanto, S. (2016). Perkembangan Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) dan Antisipasinya dengan Penal Policy. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 5(1).
Wibowo, A. (2012). Kebijakan kriminalisasi delik pencemaran nama baik di Indonesia. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 7(1).
Widowaty, Y. (2012). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Korban Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Yudisial, 5(2), 154–169.
Zainal, A. (2016). Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Teknologi Informasi Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana. Al-’Adl, 9(1), 57–74.
