JURIDICAL STUDY ON CRIMINAL ACTS OF ONLINE TOGEL GAMBLING
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Gholib Yudha Mawaridi*
Surya Nita
Eva Achjani Zulfa
Online gambling has gained popularity worldwide as a major entertainment industry. However, this growth has also brought about concerns regarding criminal activities such as fraud, money laundering, and illegal gambling operations. This study aims to analyze the considerations of judges in sentencing online gambling crimes and proving online togel gambling crimes. The research adopts a normative juridical approach (legal research) to examine the application of rules or norms in positive law using a statute-based approach. The analysis reveals that Article 303 and Article 303 Bis of the Criminal Code are utilized to address online gambling crimes, particularly online togel gambling. Although Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2011 regarding Electronic Information and Transactions can serve as a legal basis, it was not applied in this case. When deciding a criminal case, judges must take into account various factors, including ensuring that the actions charged meet the formulation of the offense and are in violation of the law, assessing the defendant's ability to be held accountable, and considering any justifications presented. Furthermore, the judge should also consider objective requirements, such as a complete indictment, case submission letter, and the case file. In the context of online togel gambling, evidence is evaluated using the theory of the Negative Legal System, which mandates at least two valid pieces of evidence as stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in conjunction with the judge's own belief. Despite the availability of the Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) Law as a legal basis, this study demonstrates the continued reliance on Article 303 of the Criminal Code for such cases, indicating that the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali (specific laws override general laws) does not apply.
Atmasasmita, R. (2011). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, cet. Ke-2, Jakarta: Kencana.
Azania, A. M. I., & Mircahya, I. (2013). Strategi Adaptasi Bandar Judi Togel (Toto Gelap) Di Kota Pasuruan. Journal, Surabaya: Antopologi FISIP-UNAIR.
Bonger, W. A. (1962). Pengantar Tentang Kriminologi (Terjemahan RA Koesnoen). PT Pembangunan.
Edmon, M. (2003). Kompilasi Hukum Telematika. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Gaurifa, I. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perjudian Secara Online (Studi Putusan 121/Pid. B/2012/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, 1(2), 111–121.
Handrio, V. A., & Widowaty, Y. (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Tindak Pidana Perjudian Togel Via Online. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 3(3), 153–166.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Salam, A., Zuwandana, A., Al Azmi, C., Wijaya, C. R., Darnita, Tania, I., Lubis, L. K. A., Sitorus, M. A. P., Adawiyah, R., & Sinaga, R. (2022). Analysis of The Implementation of Law in every level of Society in Indonesia. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.80
Karo, R. K., & Sebastian, A. (2019). Juridical analysis on the criminal act of online shop fraud in Indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 6, 1.
Kurniawan, Y., Siregar, T., & Hidayani, S. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Studi Pada Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara). ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 4(1), 28–44.
Lakoro, A., Badu, L., & Achir, N. (2020). Lemahnya Kepolisian Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perjudian Togel Online. Jurnal Legalitas, 13(01), 31–50.
Mestre-Bach, G., Steward, T., Granero, R., Fernández-Aranda, F., Talón-Navarro, M. T., Cuquerella, À., Baño, M., Moragas, L., del Pino-Gutiérrez, A., & Aymamí, N. (2018). Gambling and impulsivity traits: A recipe for criminal behavior? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 6.
Nababan, P. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Perjudian Togel (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor: 2506/PID. B/2018/PN-MDN). JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 3(2), 494–506.
Panggabean, H. P. (2012). Hukum pembuktian teori-praktik dan yurisprudensi Indonesia. Alumni.
Rossa, N. O., Nurmalasari, R., Prameswari, L., & Savella, A. D. (2020). Gambling (Judi Togel) in Criminology Perspective (Study in Diponegoro and Peterongan Stadium in Semarang City). Law Research Review Quarterly, 6(2), 157–172.
Santoso, T., & Zulfa, E. A. (2009). Hukum Pidana Materiil & Formil. Kumpulan Pengajar Hukum Pidana, Published USAID, The Asia Foundation and Kemitraan Partnership.
Saragih, P. T., Kalo, S., Mulyadi, M., & Yunara, E. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Judi Online Menurut Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. USU LAW JOURNAL, 6(2), 18–43.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Legal research, a brief overview. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. F. (1992). Principles of criminology. Altamira Press.
