EVALUATION OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION LEARNING PROGRAM BY USING COUNTENANCE EVALUATION MODEL
Main Article Content
This study aims to determine: (1) the quality of preparation, (2) the quality of implementation, and (three) the impact of students' learning on the implementation of PAI clump learning at MTs Arifah Gowa. This research is an assessment model used is Countenance Stake. The source of data in this study is the PAI clump subject teacher of MTs Arifah Gowa as many as 9 people. The research methods used are interviews, observation and documentation. The data analysis technique used means Miles and Huberman data analysis technique. The results showed that (1) the quality of learning planning for PAI subjects in the independent curriculum is categorized as good, (2) the application process and learning evaluation are categorized as good and (3) student learning outcomes in PAI subjects are categorized as good.
Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 3. Bumi Aksara.
Azizah, N., & Zainudin, M. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (Studi di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 dan SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Kota Palembang). Edification Journal: Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 133–143.
Dixit, M. (2014). Professionalization of teacher education. International Journal of Research, 1(4), 249–254.
Faradhiba, D. P., & Inayati, N. L. (2023). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Di SMP Negeri. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 341–351.
Frank-Oputu, E. A., & Dorgu, T. E. (2016). Learning for Intellectual and Emotional Development Among Undergraduate Students in Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 4(9), 1–15.
Hidayat, T., & Asyafah, A. (2019). Konsep Dasar Evaluasi Dan Implikasinya Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 159–181.
Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 1–21.
Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 45.
Petrie, K., & McGee, C. (2012). Teacher professional development: Who is the learner? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 59–72.
Sharma, J. (2014). Pre-service teacher education reforms in India and Pakistan: challenges and possibilities. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 2(2), 1–13.
Soedijarto, S. (2008). Upaya Percepatan Peningkatan Kualifikasi Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Non Formal (Ptk-pnf). Jurnal Ilmiah Visi, 3(1), 30–33.
Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68(7), 1–15.
Winarno, M. E. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Wood, B. B. (2001). Stake’s countenance model: evaluating an environmental education professional development course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(2), 18–27.
Zenelaj, E. (2013). Education for sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(4), 227.