DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS FOR LEARNING OUTCOMES
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Ina Magdalena
Suci Arwindi*
Saka Nayla Hasan
This paper aims to provide understanding of assessment instruments for learning outcomes, focusing on benchmark learning outcome tools, norm-referenced and benchmark-referenced tests, validity, reliability, and practicality considerations, various types of tests, and the process of preparing assessment tools. Additionally, it explores performance-based assessment tools, emphasizing the significance of authentic assessment in an educational context. The research adopts a qualitative descriptive paradigm, oriented towards understanding nuances, perspectives, and subjective experiences related to learning outcomes assessment tools. This approach allows exploration of perceptions from teachers, students, and other stakeholders. Assessment is a crucial process in education, involving the collection of data to make informed decisions. This paper underscores the importance of various assessment types and techniques, ranging from daily quizzes to school exams. To ensure accurate and meaningful data, educators must use diverse assessment methods aligned with students' learning processes. The development of assessment tools is guided by determining types, forms, and variations based on specific needs. Effective assessment adheres to established principles, ensuring accuracy and reliability. The paper acknowledges potential shortcomings and errors, recommending the creation of a framework, use of relevant sources, effective collaboration, and time management when undertaking similar writing tasks.
Amrulloh, M. A. (2015). Sistem Penilaian dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 7(2), 125–148.
Ebel, A. (2016). Two essays on determinants of firm-level employee job satisfaction: Organization capital and within firm pay gap. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Helwig, N. E., Hong, S., Hsiao-Wecksler, E. T., & Polk, J. D. (2011). Methods to temporally align gait cycle data. Journal of Biomechanics, 44(3), 561–566.
Inanna, I., Rahmatullah, R., & Hasan, M. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktek. Tahta Media Group.
Kunandar. (2011). Evaluasi program pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(2), 171–181.
Lumbantobing LR. (2021). Kelebihan dan Keterbatasan dari Bentuk-Bentuk Penilaian Tes Tertulis. Pusdiklat Keuangan Umum. https://klc2.kemenkeu.go.id/kms/knowledge/kelebihan-keterbatasan-penilaian-tes- tertulis-0f81178c/detail/
Miller, D. M., & Linn, R. L. (2000). Validation of performance-based assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(4), 367–378.
Muhson, A. (2014). Penyusunan Alat Penilaian Hasil Belajar Dan Analisis Butir Soalnya. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132232818/pengabdian/ali-muhson-2012-penyusunan-alat-penilaian-hasil-belajar-sma-1-bantul.pdf
Nisrokha, N. (2018). Penilaian Otentik. Madaniyah, 8(2), 209–229.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2001). Penilaian dalam pengajaran bahasa dan sastra. BPFE-Yogyakarta.
Pangastuti, R., & MunfaAti, K. (2018). Penilaian Acuan Norma, Penilaian Acuan Patokan, Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal Di Madrasah Ibtidaiah an-Nur Plus Junwangi Krian Sidorajo Jawa Timur. Tarbiyah Al-Awlad: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam Tingkat Dasar, 8(2), 202–217.
Sax, G. (1980). Principles of Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. Belmont, California: Wadsworth. Inc.
Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suparman, M. A. (2012). Desain Instruksional Modern: Panduan Para Pengajar dan Inovator Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama.
Suparmin, U. A. (2012). Validitas, reliabilitas, dan kepraktisan ujian melalui observasi dan bentuk lisan bagi kelas besar pada prodi PAI Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Bahasa Iain Surakarta. Kodifikasia, 6(1), 1–12.
TenBrink, T. D. (1974). Evaluation: a practical guide for teachers. (No Title).
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1990). Educational measurement and testing. (No Title).
