EFFECTIVENESS OF ECO ENZYME HAND SANITIZER ON DECREASING THE NUMBER OF GERMS ON HANDS WITH DOSAGE SCALE OF 1 : 600
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Rusdi*
Andi Daramusseng
M. Rahul Ridwan
The environmental problem we see today is waste. Around 70% of the total waste generation is dominated by organic waste which is considered only as residual waste that has no economic value. With the high problem of organic waste, one solution to reduce household waste such as fruit and vegetable waste into eco-enzyme is made hand sanitizer. The purpose of this study was to see the effectiveness of eco-enzyme hand sanitizer on reducing the number of germs on hands with a dose scale of 1:600. The type of research used is experimental. The analysis used is univariate and bivariate analysis. The samples in this study were 15 students of the undergraduate of Environmental Health study program, Muhammadiyah University, East Kalimantan. The sampling technique in this research is random sampling. Based on the results of this study, there were 13 students who experienced a decrease in the number of germs on their hands while 2 students experienced an increase in the number of germs on their hands by being treated and after being treated (Hand sanitizer). The results of the Wilcoxon bivariate test between before being treated and after being treated with the use of eco-enzyme hand sanitizers got P 0.001 (smaller than 0.05), then the eco-enzyme hand sanitizer that has been made is effective in killing germs on hands.
Bardono, S. (2020). Permintaan Jeruk Dalam Negeri Meningkat di Masa Pandemi Covid-19.
Dewi, S. P., S. dan S. (2021). Pembuatan dan Uji Organoleptik Eco-enzyme dari Kulit Buah Jeruk. Seminar Nasional dan Call for Paper Hubisintek. 649–657.
Gay, L. R., & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research Mothods for Business and Management. MacMillan Publishing Company.
Giano Excelsis Pangemanan, Meity N. Tanor, Verawati I. Y. Roring, Nova LIM Ogi, L. R. (2022). Perbandingan Daya Disinfeksi Ekoenzim Berdasarkan Beda Komposisi Bahan Organik Comparison of Disinfection Performance By Differences of. Nukleus Biosains, 3(1), 34–42.
Hasanah Yaya, Mawarni Lisa, & Hamidah Hanum. (2020). Eco enzyme and its benefits for organic rice production and disinfectant. Journal of Saintech Transfer, 3(2), 119–128.
Made Rai Rahayu, Nengah, M., & Yohanes Parlindungan Situmeang. (2021). Acceleration of Production Natural Disinfectants from the Combination of Eco-Enzyme Domestic Organic Waste and Frangipani Flowers (Plumeria alba). SEAS (Sustainable Environment Agricultural Science), 5(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.22225/seas.5.1.3165.15-21
Manik, M., Kaban, J., Silalahi, J., & Ginting, M. (2021). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with probiotic potential from Dengke Naniura. Baghdad Science Journal, 18(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2021.18.1.0035
Nur Anisa, D., Utami, G. N., Nurvazly, D. E., & Chasanah, S. L. (2022). Pembuatan Eco Enzyme Sebagai Hand Sanitizer Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Covid-19 Bagi Warga SMPN 2 Sekampung. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (JPKM) TABIKPUN, 3(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpkmt.v3i1.62
Pratamadina, E., & Wikaningrum, T. (2022). Potensi Penggunaan Eco Enzyme pada Degradasi Deterjen dalam Air Limbah Domestik. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 7(1), 2722–2728. https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v7i1.3881
Rusdianasari, Syakdani, A., Zaman, M., Sari, F. F., Nasyta, N. P., & Rizka Amalia. (2021). Pemanfaatan Eco-Enzymes dari Limbah Kulit Buah Sebagai Hand Sanitizer. Asian Journal of Applied Research Untuk Pengembangan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 5(3), 1–5.
Sahabuddin, Sinardi, F., Iryani, A. S., & Iryani. (2017). Pendahuluan Era modern seperti saat ini membuat masyarakat cenderung menyukai produk instan dan praktis . Seiring dengan mobilitas yang semakin meningkat , tidak telah banyak dilakukan seiring dengan meningkatnya dampak negatif yang timbul pada kesehatan. November, 167–175.
Yanti, D., & Awalina, R. (2021). Sosialisasi dan Pelatihan Pengolahan Sampah Organik Menjadi Eco-Enzyme. Jurnal Warta Pengabdian Andalas, 28(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.25077/jwa.28.2.84-90.2021
