Road Damage Analysis Using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method as the Basis for Road Handling Programs on Provincial Roads in Pacitan Regency
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Fuad Jauhar Zuhri*
Andi Patriadi
Sajiyo
Land transportation infrastructure, such as roads and bridges, plays a crucial role as a link between regions that supports the economic, social, and cultural growth of a region. With limited budget in road management in Pacitan Regency, priority determination is needed to ensure that road management is carried out more efficiently and on target. This study aims to calculate the weight of the criteria using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on expert opinions and to determine the priority order of road management in Pacitan Regency by utilizing the Provincial/Regency Road Management System (PKRMS) application, the AHP method, and a combination of the two methods. The method used in this study involves AHP with six criteria, namely road conditions, traffic volume, road connectivity, regional development, connecting economic and agricultural areas, and connecting public service facilities. This study focuses on five road sections in Pacitan Regency. The results of the study show that based on the AHP method, the road connectivity criterion gets the highest weight of (35%), followed by connecting public service facilities (22%), road conditions (14%), connecting economic and agricultural areas (13%), regional development (12%), and traffic volume (4%).
Aan, C. Z. (2023). Analisis Data Dasar Prasarana Pada Ruas Jalan Kabupaten Sumbawa Menggunakan Software Pkrms (Provincial/Kabupaten Road Management System). Universitas_Muhammadiyah_Mataram.
Anjani, Y., & Mahendra, M. (2023). Prioritas Penanganan Jalan Dengan Sistem Manajemen Jalan Di Kabupaten Lombok Utara. Ganec Swara, 17(2), 557–565.
Asalam, A., Karyawan, I. D. M. A., & Muhajirah, M. (2021). Analisis Kerusakan Ruas Jalan Talabiu-Simpasai Kabupaten Bima Menggunakan Aplikasi Provincial And Kabupaten Road Management System (PKRMS). Media Bina Ilmiah, 15(7), 4877–4886.
Austroads. (2006). Teknik manajemen aset jalan. Austroads.
Fadillah Akbar, R. (2024). Evaluasi Kerusakan Jalan Menggunakan Program Provincial/Kabupaten Road Management System (PKRMS) Pada Ruas Jalan Tabana-Kokang, Pajinian-Ilepati. Waiwadan-Danibao, SP. Gerong-Tenahewang, Sagu-Arang Pada Kabupaten Flores Timur. Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang.
Farhan, M., Rafie, R., & Nuh, S. M. (2022). Sistem Manajemen Jalan Untuk Menentukan Prioritas Rehabilitasi Jalan Provinsi Dengan Menggunakan Program PKRMS. JeLAST: Jurnal Teknik Kelautan, PWK, Sipil, Dan Tambang, 9(1).
Firdaus, M. (2018). Analisis prioritas penanganan jalan dalam pengelolaan infrastruktur transportasi. Jurnal Teknik Transportasi, 45(2).
Haryanto, E. (2019). Peran prasarana jalan dalam mendukung pembangunan di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pembangunan Daerah, 36(1).
Masagung, M. (2023). Analisis prioritas penanganan jalan kabupaten Brebes menggunakan aplikasi PKRMS kombinasi dengan metode AHP. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).
Putra, A. N., Sutandi, S., & Hidayat, I. (2022). Kombinasi metode AHP dan PKRMS dalam analisis prioritas penanganan jalan. Jurnal Manajemen Infrastruktur, 22(3).
Ramadan, I., Widodo, S., & Sumiyattinah, S. (2023). Analisis Kerusakan Jalan Provinsi Ruas Jalan Simpang Bantanan I-II Kabupaten Sambas Menggunakan Software PKRMS. JeLAST: Jurnal Teknik Kelautan, PWK, Sipil, Dan Tambang, 10(3).
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
SK Gubernur Jawa Timur. (2023). Panjang total ruas jalan provinsi di Kabupaten Pacita. Surat Keputusan Gubernur Jawa Timur No. 456/2023.
Sutandi, S. (2021). Implementasi PKRMS untuk pengelolaan jaringan jalan provinsi. Jurnal Teknologi Infrastruktur, 15(4).
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2014). Economic Development 12th ed.
