Critical Analysis of the Implementation of Academic Ability Tests (TKA) in Vocational Secondary Schools: A Descriptive-Analytical Literature Review of the Impact of Permendikdasmen No. 9 of 2025
Main Article Content
Yudhi Hertanto*
Ira Miranti
Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education Regulation No. 9 of 2025 introduces the Academic Ability Test (TKA) as a standard evaluation instrument. Its implementation in Vocational High Schools (SMK), which focus on practical competencies and work readiness, raises the potential for conflict. This study aims to analyse the potential impact and challenges of implementing the TKA in SMKs and its implications for vocational pedagogy. The research method used a descriptive-analytical qualitative approach with a literature review. A policy implementation diagnostic framework and a conflict-ambiguity typology model were used to assess the compatibility between the TKA and the objectives of vocational education. The results of the analysis shed light that there is a dissonance between the academic focus of TKA and the competency-based philosophy of SMK. Implementation challenges are predicted to be systemic, including obstacles related to policy standards, resource availability, and implementer disposition. In addition, at the school level, covert resistance and strategic adaptation to protect the identity of vocational pedagogy are likely to emerge. This policy is categorised as ‘Political Implementation,’ where formal compliance may occur, but actual practice in the field adapts to the needs and characteristics of vocational schools. It can therefore be concluded that the application of standard academic evaluation in vocational schools risks weakening vocational pedagogy and may compromise the core mission of vocational education.
Anggraini, F., Oktageri, D., Akbar, M., Sabila, A., Yuliana, Y., & Wakhinuddin, W. (2024). Research Trends in Assessment Instrument Development in Vocational High Schools: a Literature Review. International Journal of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM), 4(3), 1387–1396.
Arnita, H., & Fadriati, F. (2022). Efektifitas Kebijakan Pendidikan Vokasi di Sekolah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 8129–8137.
Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222.
Au, W. (2022). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. Routledge.
Bonner, S. M. (2012). Validity in classroom assessment: Purposes, properties, and principles. SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. California: SAGE Publications, 87–107.
Coniam, D., & Falvey, P. (2007). High-stakes testing and assessment: English language teacher benchmarking. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 457–471). Springer.
Dese, A., Murwantini, S., & Pancawati, R. (2024). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Link and Match SMK dengan Dunia Usaha/Industri. Steam Engineering, 5(2), 118–124.
Fatinah, F. N., Hikmat, M. H., & Ratih, K. (2025). Authentic Assessment in Vocational High School: Teachers’ Perspectives, Practice and Challenges. JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 6(1), 61–70.
Gumay, F. M., Distrik, I. W., Suyatna, A., & Azizah, M. (2024). Development of the Link and Match Learning Program through the Application of the Dual-System Method to Support the Industrial Revolution 4.0 in Sinergy with Freedom to Learn. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 5789–5797.
Hana, H., Arpianto, I. Y., ST, M. M., Erdani, Y., Ing, D. E. L., Hanna, R. N., SS, M. P., Wuryani, M., & Rusli, H. (2024). Manajemen Pendidikan Vokasi dan Manajemen Pelatihan Keterampilan. Penerbit Adab.
Irawati, D., Masitoh, S., & Nursalim, M. (2022). Filsafat pendidikan Ki Hajar Dewantara sebagai landasan pendidikan vokasi di era kurikulum merdeka. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 7(4), 1015–1025.
Juriyah, J., Fahrudin, T., & Jalaludin, J. (2025). Analisis Kesiapan Implementasi Kebijakan Tes Kemampuan Akademik (TKA) 2025 oleh Kemendikbud. YASIN Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Budaya, 5(6), 5708–5721.
Mashudi, M., & Azzahro, F. (2019). Contextual Teaching and Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Di SMP Negeri 2 Jember dan SMP Negeri 3 Jember. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 22(1), 21–39.
Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.
Raharjo, S. B. (2017). Persepsi Guru Dan Siswa Terhadap Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah di SMA Negeri I Kalasan Sleman. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 10(3), 183–199.
Rifa’i, M., Hasanah, I., Zubairi, Z., & Sa’ad, M. (2022). Implementasi Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Bahasa Arab:(Studi Kasus di MTs Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo). TARQIYATUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 1(2), 68–82.
Rohaeni, E., Trisnamansyah, S., Wasliman, I., & Sauri, S. (2021). Implementation of teaching factory in improving the competence of vocational high school students (SMK). Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 598–609.
Rojaki, M., Fitria, H., & Martha, A. (2021). Manajemen kerja sama sekolah menengah kejuruan dengan dunia usaha dan dunia industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 6337–6349.
Saiman, R., & Kasman, R. (2025). Ketercapaian Kurikulum Merdeka dan Kesiapan Guru di Daerah Terdepan, Terluar, dan Tertinggal (3-T). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 137–152.
Saptadi, N. T. S., Septiani, S., Wardoyo, T. H., Hidayati, W., Thoif, M., Talindong, A., Audia, F., Nashiroh, P. K., Hadikusumo, R. A., & Suroya, L. F. (2025). Pendidikan Vokasional: Teori dan Praktik. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Scriven, M. (1994). Evaluation as a discipline. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(1), 147–166.
Subarsono, A. G. (2012). Analisis kebijakan publik: konsep, teori dan aplikasi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (p. 336).
Tanjung, A. R., David, D., Renaldo, N., Putra, R., & Musa, S. (2024). Open Unemployment Rate Based on Education Level at 2015-2018. Reflection: Education and Pedagogical Insights, 2(1), 9–14.
Tasyak, U. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan program beasiswa satu rumah satu sarjana dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat di Desa Ponggok Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan, 11(4), 73–85.
Tawil, M., & Tampa, A. (2025). Pelatihan Pembuatan Asesmen Kinerja Praktikum IPA Berbasis Higher-Order Thinking Skill Bagi Guru Ipa Di SMP Terbuka Di Makassar. Jurnal Altifani Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 123–133.
Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488.
Villarroel, V., Melipillán, R., Santana, J., & Aguirre, D. (2024). How authentic are assessments in vocational education? An analysis from Chilean teachers, students, and examinations. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1308688.
Wardhany, F. S., Suwondo, S., Budi, I. F., & Jalinus, N. (2024). Implementasi Program Revitalisasi Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 3246–3252.
Young, J. Q. (2022). Building a system of competency-based assessment. In Graduate Medical Education in Psychiatry: From Basic Processes to True Innovation (pp. 267–290). Springer.
Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Mohamad Yasin, R., Hashim, H. U., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). An assessment approaches and learning outcomes in technical and vocational education: A systematic review using PRISMA. Sustainability, 14(9), 5225.
