ACCELERATION ANALYSIS USING THE CRASHING METHOD IN THE SDN KUTISARI 2 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Muhammad Bayu Firdaus*
Hanie Teki Tjendani
Budi Witjaksana
In the construction of the Kutisari 2 SDN Project, there were several obstacles that hampered the implementation of the project, such as heavy rainy weather. The aim of the research is to determine the cost and acceleration time for the construction of the SDN Kutisari 2 Project. The research design was carried out to identify the time and costs of implementing the building construction completion project. The research was conducted at CV.Nisya Multi Bintang as the implementing contractor with a budget of Rp. 1,614,171,924 for 165 calendar days. The research subjects were contractors completing work on the Kutisari 2 Elementary School Development Project. This research used secondary data from the Draft Expenditure Budget, Schedule, weekly reports and project cost costs. Data analysis used Microsoft Project 2016 software. The results of the research stated (1) The duration of the Crashing was 8 calendar days with work that was on the Critical Work Route for the Construction of School Facilities, Infrastructure and Utilities at SDN Kutisari 2, namely water proofing coating with fiber on the 2nd floor, cleaning location to the end, B-0 work to cover 2nd floor columns, 2nd floor column cutting work, and floor screading work. (2) From the initial cost of the Kutisari 2 SDN School Facilities, Infrastructure and Utilities Construction Work Project, namely Rp. 1,164,171,924 with additional costs due to Crashing of Rp. 24,569,780 so the total costs due to the Crashing are Rp. 1,638,741,704.
Adi, R. R. B., Traulia, D. 2018. Acceleration Analysis of Project Crash Method Case Study Program: Sentraland Mixed Use Building Construction Project. Journal of Civil Engineering Works, 5(2), 148–158. Https://Ejournal3.Undip.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jkts/Article/View/12625.
Alamsyah, H. J. 2019. Evaluation of the Scheduling Project for Building Homes for Nurses and Midwives in Karimun Regency Using the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (Pert). Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau State Islamic University.
Assaf, S., & Al-Hejji, S. 2006. Causes of Delays in Large Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 349–357.
Ayuningtyas, P. 2018. Project Acceleration Analysis Using the Crashing Method. UAJY.
Bulba, A. T., Rauzana. 2022. Identification of Cost Risks for Implementing Building Construction Projects for Contractor Companies. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, 8(2), 121. Https://Doi.Org/10.35308/Jts-Utu.V8i2.6284.
Fadhilah, N. 2020. The Influence of Contractor Management on Quality Achievement of Construction Work in Demak Regency. Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang.
Frederika, A. 2020. Analysis of Accelerating Implementation by Increasing Optimum Working Hours on Construction Projects (Case Study: Super Villa Development Project, Peti Tenget-Badung). Udayana University.
Mahapatni. 2019. Construction Project Planning and Control Methods. Denpasar: UNHI Press.
Malifa, Y., Dundu, A. 2019. Construction Using Crashing Method (Case Study: Construction of IAIN Manado Flats). Journal of Civil Statistics, 7(6), 681–688.
Muchtar, S. Al. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research. Independent Library Degree.
Ningrum, F. G. A, et al. 2017. Application of the Crashing Method in Accelerating Project Duration with Alternatives of Adding Overtime Hours and Work Shifts (Case Study: Grand Keisha Hotel Construction Project, Yogyakarta). CIVIL ENGINEERING MATRIX E-Journal, 583–591.
Putra, H. D. 2018. Definition of Project. [Online]. Available.
Sugiyono. 2019. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods.
Yudhagama. 2020. Analysis of Project Delays in the Construction of the Uin Sunan Ampel Library Building, Surabaya. Indonesian Islamic University.