Digital Literacy as an Action Plan to Prevent Online Fraud Using the Triangle Scheme in the Jurisdiction of Makassar Police Headquarters
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Rinal Krishna Triananda*
Basir S.
Muhamad Erza Aminanto
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive strategies implemented by the Makassar Police Headquarters (Polrestabes) in handling triangle scheme online fraud, a form of cybercrime that is increasingly prevalent alongside the rise in online transaction activities among the public. A qualitative approach with case study methodology is used to examine in depth the digital literacy strategies initiated by Makassar Police Headquarters, including collaboration between internal functional units and synergy with external stakeholders. Research findings indicate that although institutional frameworks and legal regulations are available, the implementation of digital literacy programs still faces constraints including budget limitations, gaps in digital technology mastery, and suboptimal reach of educational programs to peripheral areas. SWOT analysis and application of social system theory, community policing, and digital literacy implementation models indicate the need for strengthening human resource capacity, diversifying socialization methods, and establishing cross-sector collaborative forums to strengthen the community's digital security ecosystem. This research recommends the formulation of strategic policies that integrate digital literacy with law enforcement based on the Information and Electronic Transaction Law, Criminal Code, as well as personal data protection and consumer protection regulations. With a comprehensive and sustainable approach, prevention of triangle scheme online fraud can be optimized as part of the national cyber security strategy.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Barnor, J. N. B., Boateng, R., Kolog, E. A., & Afful-Dadzie, A. (2020). Rationalizing online romance fraud: In the eyes of the offender. 26th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2020.
Fitriani, S. (2020). Perpustakaan Dan Gerakan Sadar Literasi Sebagai Upaya Menangkal Hoaks. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi Islam, 01(01).
Guntik, D. S., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2022). Corporations As Whistleblowers In The Crime Of Defamation Based On The Electronic And Transaction Information Act. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.43
Januri, J., Melati, D. P., & Muhadi, M. (2022). Upaya Kepolisian Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Cyber Terorganisir. Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 1(02). https://doi.org/10.24967/jaeap.v1i02.1692
Kasim, Z. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana untuk Penanggulangan Cyber Crime di Indonesia. Indragiri Law Review, 2(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.32520/ilr.v2i1.22
Kodmalwar, P., Maheshwari, A., Palav, M., Priya, S., Purusothaman, N., & Namdeo, A. (2024). Real-Time Fraud Detection Using AI and Signal Processing (pp. 121–136). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7367-5.ch009
Kshetri, N. (2013). Cybercrime and cybersecurity in the global south. Springer.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage publications.
Rahman, Z. A. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Edukasi Literasi Digital untuk Peningkatan Keamanan Data dan Pencegahan Kejahatan Siber di Masyarakat Rawang Panca Arga. Merkurius : Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi Dan Teknik Informatika, 2(6), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.61132/merkurius.v2i6.399
Rumata, V. M. (2017). Komunikasi Keluarga Masyarakat Kota Dan Desa Di Era Teknologi Komunikasi. Journal Pekommas, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2017.2020105
Skogan, W. G. (2003). Community policing: Can it work? Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Tropina, T. (2017). Cyber-policing: the role of the police in fighting cybercrime. European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin, 2.
Tsaniyah, N., & Juliana, K. A. (2019). Literasi Digital Sebagai Upaya Menangkal Hoaks Di Era Disrupsi. Al-Balagh : Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22515/balagh.v4i1.1555
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton university press.
Wang, J., Li, S., & Guo, W. (2020). The role of legal frameworks in combating cybercrime: A comparative study. Computer Law & Security Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105381
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Zimmerman, M. (2000). Empowerment Theory: Psychological, Organizational and Community Levels of Analysis. Handbook of Community Psychology.
