Analysis of the Police's Efforts and Related Agencies in Conducting Development and Improving Performance in Disclosing Criminal Acts in Corruption Cases
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Mario Michael Tambunan*
Basir S.
Sylvia Prisca Delima
Corruption remains a critical issue undermining governance, public trust, and development, particularly in developing countries. The Indonesian National Police (Polri), alongside institutions such as the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Attorney General's Office, plays a pivotal role in addressing this challenge. This study examines the efforts and strategies implemented by the police and related agencies in enhancing their performance in the investigation and disclosure of corruption crimes. This research employs a qualitative method through a case study approach, focusing on institutional coordination, capacity building, legal framework improvements, and inter-agency collaboration. The findings indicate that while progress has been made in strengthening investigative capacity through training, organizational reform, and technological advancement, significant obstacles persist. These include bureaucratic inefficiencies, limited human resources, lack of political will, and legal loopholes exploited by corrupt actors. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of synergizing institutional roles to avoid overlapping duties and to enhance the overall effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts. It also emphasizes the need for continuous evaluation and development programs aimed at boosting the professionalism and integrity of law enforcement officers. In conclusion, a multi-sectoral and sustainable approach involving both preventive and repressive strategies is essential to improve performance in combating corruption. The study recommends stronger institutional integration, enhanced resource allocation, and the establishment of a clear performance evaluation system to ensure measurable progress in corruption case disclosure.
Abubakar, A., Prasojo, E., & Jannah, L. M. (2017). Collaborative Governance in Eradicating Corruption in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaspgs-icbap-17.2017.21
Agnew, R. (2017). Revitalizing Merton: General Strain Theory. In The Origins of American Criminology: Advances in Criminological Theory, Voulme 16 (Vol. 16). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315133683-7
Butt, S. (2011). Anti-corruption reform in Indonesia: an obituary? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 47(3), 381–394.
Deflem, M. (2017). Anomie, strain, and opportunity structure: Robert K. Merton’s paradigm of deviant behavior. In The Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Criminology (pp. 140–155). wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011385.ch8
Fakhrizy, I. M. (2021). Combating Corruption: Problems and Challenges in Indonesia. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i4.48186
Fetomalae, M. A., Angi, Y. F., & Oematan, H. M. (2024). Pengawasan Inspektorat Daerah Dalam Mewujudkan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa di Kabupaten Malaka. TRANSEKONOMIKA: AKUNTANSI, BISNIS DAN KEUANGAN, 4(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v4i1.594
Fikri, H. (2022). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 7(2), 194–209.
Gunawan, I., & Bahari, Y. (2024). Penyebab Tingginya Kasus Korupsi Dana Desa Dalam Sudut Pandang Teori Struktural Fungsional Talcot Parson (Study Literatur). Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), 4(4), 609–618.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Delardi, E., Irwansyah, A., Bascara, D., Ansori, B., & Tanjung, F. (2022). The Eradication Of Corruption And The Enforcement Of The Law In Indonesia As Seen Through The Lens Of Legal Philosophy. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 1–8.
Jawa, D., Malau, P., & Ciptono, C. (2024). Tantangan dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 7(2), 1006–1017.
Komisi, K. P. (2006). Memahami Untuk Membasmi. Jakarta: KPK.
Matza, S., Rahmawati, D. E., Nurmandi, A., & Suswanta, S. (2020). Corruption in Procurement of Goods and Services in Makassar City. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 7(2), 128–138.
McLeod, R. H. (2008). Inadequate budgets and salaries as instruments for institutionalizing public sector corruption in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 16(2), 199–223.
Megawati, M., Rahman, S., & Razak, A. (2024). Implementasi Fungsi Kepolisian Selaku Penyidik Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 570–588.
Prabowo, D. A., Panggabean, M. L., & Hutahaean, A. (2023). Peran Ditpolair Baharkam Polri Dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan Narkotika Melalui Jalur Laut Nusantara. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6), 367–382.
Prabowo, H. Y. (2014). To be corrupt or not to be corrupt: Understanding the behavioral side of corruption in Indonesia. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 306–326.
Suhendar, S. (2019). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Optik Hukum Pidana. Pamulang Law Review, 1(1), 85–100.
Transparency International Indonesia. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. https://ti.or.id/corruption-perceptions-index/corruption-perceptions-index-2023/
Zaki, M., Chandra, T. Y., & Mau, H. A. (2022). The Problem of Corruption Law Enforcement That Causes State Losses Since The Constitutional Court of The Republic of Indonesia Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 Decision. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(3), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i3.204
Ziyanak, S. (2014). Functionalist perspective on deviance. International Journal of Human Sciences / Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v11i1.2791
