A Non-Coercive Leasing Debt Enforcement Model: Reconceptualizing Compliance through Blockchain-Based Systems

Nanin Koeswidi Astuti

doi:10.55047/polri.v5i1.2147

A Non-Coercive Leasing Debt Enforcement Model: Reconceptualizing Compliance through Blockchain-Based Systems

Nanin Koeswidi Astuti*

Keywords: Business Law Blockchain-Based Enforcement Fiduciary Security Mata Elang Non-Coercive Debt Collection

Debt collection in motor vehicle financing in Indonesia continues to rely heavily on coercive practices carried out by third-party actors commonly known as mata elang (matel). These methods do more than raise questions of civil liability; they frequently spill over into social conflict and serious criminal law risks, as illustrated by recurring incidents of violence resulting in loss of life and broader public harm. Such conditions point to a deeper, systemic failure in the enforcement of credit agreements—one that has evolved through informal mechanisms and operates with fragile legal legitimacy. This study undertakes a normative examination of the structural weaknesses inherent in coercive debt collection practices and advances a non-coercive enforcement model grounded in blockchain technology. Using a normative legal methodology supported by conceptual and analytical approaches, the research explores issues of legitimacy, criminal liability risk, legal certainty, and the role of the state in enforcing credit obligations. The findings suggest that blockchain-based enforcement offers a transparent, automated, and institutionalized contractual framework that replaces physical force and social intimidation with systemic compliance. Rather than sidelining the state, this model strengthens state involvement through regulatory oversight and institutional validation, fostering a more legitimate, proportionate, and rule-of-law-oriented approach to obligation enforcement.

Ardiansyah, D., & Prakoso, A. L. (2024). Juridical Analysis of Car Rental Agreements (Study at PT. Persada Solo). International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law, 2(2), 239–246.

Astuti, N. K. (2026). Reconceptualising Legal Entity Structures for Indonesian Commercial Crowdfunding. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 7(1), 116–141.

Astuti, N. K., Suhariningsih, Sukarmi, & Hamidah, S. (2021). MSME Funding with Securities Crowdfunding in Indonesia and the People’s Economic System. The 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights (ICLHR), 88.

Astuti, N. K., Suhariningsih, Sukarmi, & Hamidah, S. (2024). Exploring The Essence of Indonesian Securities-Based. International Journal of Law in Changing World, 3(1), 53–80.

Atmojo, R. N. P., & Fuad, F. (2023). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Konsumen Pemegang Aset Kripto di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 9(2), 254–276. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i2.260

Atmojo, R. N. P., Tjhin, V. U., Wandoko, W., Budiastuti, D., Polla, G., Mahesa, R., & Astuti, T. N. K. (2016). Rekening Bersama (RekBer) The Indonesian Escrow Service of Money. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 11(3), 399–410.

Bedianashvili, G., & Gabroshvili, Z. (2024). Blockchain Technologies for Managing Public Debt. Ekonomisti, 1, 37–44.

Bianty, T., & Gunadi, A. (2025). Legal Force of Binding Sale Purchase Agreement Under Hand Reviewed From The Principle Of Pacta Sunt Servanda. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v10i2.24375

Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond Procedural Justice : A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice BEYOND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE : A. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1).

Daffa, A., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2025). Pelanggaran Privasi Nasabah: Analisis Hukum atas Praktik Pembocoran Data oleh Bank kepada Mata Elang. Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(2), 280–291.

Dylan, J., Kamil, M., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2025). The Role of AI Chatbots in Enhancing Customer Satisfaction: A Case Study of E-Commerce in Digital Service Transformation. 2025 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS68501.2025.11327014

Fakhri, M., Romadhon, M., Nurtasya, M. S., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2026). Sustainable Development in E - Commerce: Assessing the Influence of E - WoM, Structural Assurances, Online Trust, and Reliability on Customer Satisfaction. In S. C. Mukhopadhyay, S. M. N. A. Senanayake, & P. W. C. Prasad (Eds.), Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications (Vol. 1512, pp. 463–475). Springer, Cham.

Farid, F., Renggong, R., & Tira, A. (2024). Tindakan Kekerasan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Penagih Utang Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 7(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v7i1.5266

Fikri, M., & Shabarullah. (2025). Legal Analysis of The Supreme Court Decision Number 2319 K/PID, SUS/2024 Concerning Fiduciary Guarantees in Muamalah Fiqh. JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(1), 109–130.

Filippi, P. De, & Hassan, S. (2016). Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: From code is law to law is code. First Monday, 21(12).

Inaya, A., Bustami, D. S., & Hasbi, H. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Terjadinya Pailit Oleh Debitur. Legal Dialogica, 1(1), 249–259.

Jacinda, A. J. (2024). Default In Leasing Committed by The Lessee and Its Law According To The Civil Law Code. Jurispro Law Review, 1(1), 1–8.

Kean, Y. A. B., Andryani, K., & Saputri, D. O. (2025). Analysis of Lobbying and Negotiation between Debt Collector and Debtor on the Online Loans Kredivo in Yogyakarta. Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management, 4(1), 189–200.

Lessig, L. (1999). CODE and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books.

Maukar, J. S., Bawole, H. Y. A., & Taroreh, H. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Wanprestasi Terhadap PLN Yang Memutus Aliran Listrik Konsumen Yang Menunggak Pembayaran. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT, 13(5).

Pranoto, W. S. A., & Soemartono, G. P. (2023). Legal Certainty of Creditor’s Rights in The Fiduciary Agreement. Unes Law Review, 6(1), 3054–3068.

Rumawi, Basuki, U., Towadi, M., & Supianto. (2022). Parate Executie Concept in Fiduciary Based on Ratio Decidendi of Constitutional Court Decision. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(September).

Samola, J., Tenda, E., Pinontoan, B., & Ketaren, E. (2024). The Implementation of Blockchain System in Verhicle Registration Certificate (BPKB) Data Based on a Website. Jurnal TIMES Technology Informatics and Computer System, XIII(2), 275–285.

Sari, S. T., & Suryono, A. (2021). Tinjauan Hubungan Hukum Perjanjian Leasing Kendaraan Bermotor. Privat Law, 9(January-June), 192–201.

Sindoro, C., Arifin, Z., Ilmi, M., & Sediati, D. S. R. (2024). Analisis Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Journal Juridisch, 2(1), 39–49.

Stark, A. B., & Sanchez-Adams, C. (2022). Legal Strategies to Address Coerced Debt Table of contents.

Sujoko, D. A., Fahreza, M. F., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2023). Intention to Use Cryptocurrency Exchanges: Assessing Cryptocurrency Exchange Features. 2023 10th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS59129.2023.10291995

Syarifudin, T. (2025, December). Kronologi Pengeroyokan 2 Matel hingga Tewas di Kalibata Picu Pembakaran Kios. DetikNews.

Utomo, H. D., & Thukuse, B. (2025). Electronic Contracts (E-Contracts) and Validity in Indonesian Civil Law: Analysis of Article 1320 of The Civil Code and The ITE Law. Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 82–93.

Yudhoyono, G. E., & Basoeky, U. (2025). The Existence of Law Number 42 Of 1999 on The Execution of Object on Fiduciary Guarantees on Defaulted Debtors. Journal Equity of Law and Governance, 7(1), 89–95.