LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF ELECTRONIC AGREEMENTS REVIEWED FROM ARTICLE 1866 OF THE CIVIL CODE
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Gusti Putu Krisna Murti AV*
Dewa Gede Pradnyana Yustiawan
Legal issues with regard to authenticity, authenticity, and proof arise frequently because no laws exist to control the private information of users of electronic agreements. The aim of this research is to determine whether or not there are issues with the legal binding force of agreements established via electronic means. This study employs a normative qualitative approach, based on the analysis of secondary data and bolstered by original data collected in the field. The findings prove that digital investigative tools can be used to verify the legitimacy, veracity, and integrity of electronic contracts. A person's permission is required before any of their personally identifiable information (PHI) can be used in any way, shape, or form via technological media. The evidentiary weight of an electronic or digitally signed deal is the same as that of a handwritten one. As progress is made toward open proof, the judicial system can make use of the system. Given the prevalence of online media in modern business dealings, it follows that any evidence acquired from any source, provided it is true, is admissible so long as it does not violate public order.
Bambang, R. J., & Joni, R. (2013). Hukum ketenagakerjaan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Dotulong, T. (2014). Keberadaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Lex Privatum, 2(3).
Kumalasari, D., & Ningsih, D. W. (2018). Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian tentang Cakap Bertindak dalam Hukum menurut Pasal 1320 Ayat (2) KUH Perdata.
Mualifah, M. (2020). Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Peranan Alat-alat Bukti dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Abdi Insani, 7(3), 268–271.
Romindo, R., Muttaqin, M., Saputra, D. H., Purba, D. W., Iswahyudi, M., Banjarnahor, A. R., Kusuma, A. H. P., Effendy, F., Sulaiman, O. K., & Simarmata, J. (2019). E-Commerce: Implementasi, Strategi dan Inovasinya. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Sa’adah, N. (2020). Akibat Hukum Pembuktian Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 373/Pdt. G/2016/PN Mdn). Pamulang Law Review, 1(2), 137–150.
Sari, N. R. (2017). Komparasi Syarat Sah Nya Perjanjian Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Repertorium, 4(2).
Saruji, P. V., & Martana, N. A. (2015). Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Tandatangan Pada Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2).
Simamora, A. M., Fahmi, F., & Triana, Y. (2022). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Melalui Elektronik Ditinjau dari Pasal 1866 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata: Legal Consequences of Agreements Through Electronic Judging From Article 1866 of the Civil Code. DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW, 5(2), 108–217.
Sitorus, D. A. (2015). Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Internet (E-Commerce) Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Yahya, H. M. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Yusandy, T. (2019). Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 7(5), 645–656.
