The Effectiveness of the Indonesia Smart Program (PIP) on the Participation of High School Students in Central Java
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Haris Mendra*
Nasri Bachtiar
The 2017 Susenas data revealed that the high school participation rate in Central Java was only 18.74%, leaving 81.26% of high school-aged children without access to secondary education. The Indonesia Smart Program (PIP) aims to support the education of children from low-income families; however, only 15.09% of students benefited from the program. This study examines the effectiveness of PIP on high school participation in Central Java using logistic regression analysis on 2017 Susenas data, with a sample size of 11,424 individuals. The results indicate that PIP successfully increased school participation, although other social assistance programs had a negative impact. Urban students and female students were more likely to participate in education compared to rural students and male students. These findings are crucial for formulating more effective education policies in Central Java.
Aldama, N. A., & Kristanti, F. T. (2022). Kinerja Keuangan, Komisaris Independen, Gender Diversity, Dan Financial Distress. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 11(02), 123.
Becker, H. S., & Press, F. (1964). The other side: Perspectives on deviance (Vol. 196). Free Press New York.
Begum, I. A., Alam, M. J., Akter, S., Haque, M. M., & Rahmatullah, N. M. (2021). Productive impacts of cash transfer and conditional cash transfer programs in Bangladesh. Asian Development Perspectives (ADP), 12(1), 46–60.
Edrial, E., Putrama, R., & Sujastiawan, A. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) di SMA Negeri 1 Utan Tahun 2019-2020. Jurnal Kapita Selekta Administrasi Publik, 3(1), 109–116.
Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. R. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty. World Bank Publications.
Hasyim, M. N. A., Puspitasari, F., & Veriyanto, A. (2022). Determinan Partisipasi Sekolah Pada Pekerja Anak Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Pajak, 2(2), 18–25.
Kaarib, A., Kamarni, N., & Purwasutrisno, P. (2019). Determinan Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja Perempuan di Sumatera Barat. Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan.
Millán, T. M., Barham, T., Macours, K., Maluccio, J. A., & Stampini, M. (2019). Long-term impacts of conditional cash transfers: Review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 34(1), 119–159.
Mulyani, F., Ridwan, E., & Nazer, M. (2023). Efektivitas Program Indonesia Pintar terhadap Partisipasi Sekolah di Kawasan Barat dan Timur Indonesia. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 1328–1332.
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos*, H. A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: a further update. Education Economics, 12(2), 111–134.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Sengkey, N., Sendouw, R. H., & Mantiri, J. (2018). Implementasi Kebijakan Bantuan Beras Sejahtera (Rastra) Di Desa Lalumpe Kecamatan Motoling Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Jurnal Civic Education: Media Kajian Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1), 65–71.
Sihombing, P. R., & Pratiko, W. (2022). Aplikasi Model Diffence in Difference Pada Regresi Binomial Logistik. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Statistik Indonesia, 2(3), 244–249.
Surbakti, S. P. P., Muchtar, M., & Sihombing, P. R. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan terhadap Kemiskinan di Indonesia Periode 2015-2021. Ecoplan, 6(1), 37–45.
