THE EFFECT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON AUDIT REPORT LAG
Main Article Content
Raditya Ludfianto*
Corporate governance has emerged as a vital area of study in ensuring transparency and accountability within organizations. Two key elements of corporate governance are the Audit Committee and the Board of Commissioners. The Audit Committee plays a crucial role in overseeing financial reporting and internal controls, while the Board of Commissioners holds responsibility for strategic decision-making and overall governance. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of the Audit Committee (X1) and the Board of Commissioners (X2) on Audit Report Lag in Banking Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2018-2022 period. The research methodology used by the author is descriptive quantitative method. The population used in this study is the banking sector companies. While the data analysis used was the Common Effect Model (CEM) test, Fixed Effect Model (FEM), Random Effect Model (REM), regression test, classical assumptions, and hypothesis testing using the T test (partial) and F test (simultaneous) with using Ms. Excel and Eviews version 12. The results of the research found that the T test hypothesis 1 variable Audit Committee (X2) has an effect on the Audit Report Lag variable (Y), T test Hypothesis 2 the Board of Commissioners variable (X2) has an effect on the Audit Report Lag variable (Y), and the results of the F test show that the variables (X1 & X2) of the Audit Committee and the Board of Commissioners simultaneously affect the variable Audit Report Lag (Y).
Aristika, M. N., Trisnawati, R., & Handayani, C. D. (2016). Pengaruh Opini Audit, Ukuran Perusahaan, Umur Perusahaan, Dan Laba Rugi Terhadap Audit Report Lag.
Aryaningsih, N. N. D., & Budiartha, I. K. (2014). Pengaruh total aset, tingkat solvabilitas dan opini audit pada audit delay. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 7(3), 647–747.
Ayemere, I. L., & Elijah, A. (2015). Audit committee attributes and earnings management: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 5(4), 14–23.
de la Grange, P. B., Mombled, M., Rodriguez, L., Hery, L., Perard, B., Duchez, P., Avalon, M., Bijou, F., Thevenot, F., & Ivanovic, Z. (2017). Étude du contenu en cellules souches hématopoïétiques dans le sang péripherique mobilisé par G-CSF ou G-CSF/Plerixafor. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, 24(3), 317.
Mouna, A., & Anis, J. (2013). Financial reporting delay and investors behavior: Evidence from Tunisia.
Rusmin, R., & Evans, J. (2017). Audit quality and audit report lag: Case of Indonesian listed companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(2), 191–210.
Subekti, I., & Widiyanti, N. W. (2004). Faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap audit delay di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 7(1), 991–1002.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (p. 336).
Zarkasyi, W. (2008). Good corporate governance pada badan usaha manufaktur, perbankan, dan jasa keuangan lainnya. Bandung: Alfabeta, 5.
