THE EFFECT OF BOARD SIZE, PROFITABILITY AND CAPITAL INTENSITY ON TAX AGGRESSIVENESS IN PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE SECTOR COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE IN 2017 - 2019
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Taniya Fatimah Becik*
Nuramalia Hasanah
Indah Muliasari
The Indonesian property and real estate sector refers to the industry involved in the development, sale, purchase, and management of properties, including residential, commercial, and industrial real estate. This sector is significant in the Indonesian economy due to its contributions to employment, investment, and economic growth. This study aims to comprehensively examine the impact of board size, profitability, and capital intensity on tax aggressiveness within the context of the Indonesian property and real estate sector. Employing a quantitative approach, the research utilizes multiple linear regression analysis with Eviews software version 12 to analyze data from 60 entities in the sector listed on the Indonesian stock exchange from 2017 to 2019. The findings reveal intriguing insights. Board size is found to exert a discernible influence on tax aggressiveness, emphasizing the role of corporate governance in shaping tax strategies. However, the study challenges conventional assumptions by demonstrating that profitability does not significantly impact tax aggressiveness. In contrast, capital intensity emerges as a significant determinant of tax aggressiveness, highlighting the role of financial structure in tax planning decisions. These findings contribute to the understanding of the intricate relationship between corporate governance, financial metrics, and tax strategies in the examined sector. The research underscores the importance of nuanced decision-making in tax planning, acknowledging the varying impacts of different variables. By providing empirical evidence, this study offers valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers aiming to enhance tax strategy effectiveness and transparency.
Agoes, Sukrisno, & Trisnawati, E. (2013). Akuntansi Perpajakan (3rd ed.). Salemba Empat.
Alexander, H. B. (2019). Penerimaan Pajak Properti Turun Tipis 0,1 Persen. Kompas.
Asmoro, T. P. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi agresivitas pajak pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v4i2.95
Darussalam, & Septriadi, D. (2017). Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda. DDTC.
Hadi, J., & Mangoting, Y. (2014). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Karakteristik Dewan Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Tax & Accounting Review, 4(2), 1–10.
Halioui, K., Neifar, S., & Ben Abdelaziz, F. (2016). Corporate governance, CEO compensation and tax aggressiveness. Review of Accounting and Finance, 15(4), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-01-2015-0018
Herdawati, H., Siraja, D., & Sampe, Y. (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Perencanaan Pajak dan Beban Pajak Tangguhan terhadap Manajemen Laba (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia). JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS KONTENPORER, 7(1).
Hidayat, A. T., & Fitria, E. F. (2018). Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, Profitabilitas dan Leverage Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 13(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.26533/eksis.v13i2.289
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2018). Standar Akuntan Keuangan. Salemba Empat.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kasmir. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kieso, D. E. (2017). Intermediate Accounting: IFRS Edition. In Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons.
Mustika, A. (2017). Pengaruh capital intensity ratio dan jumlah komisaris independen terhadap agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 24–34.
Muzakki, A., & Darsono, A. (2015). Pengaruh capital intensity terhadap effective tax rate pada perusahaan food and beverage yang terdaftar di BEI. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 4(4), 1–10.
Nugraha, N. B., & Meiranto, W. (2015). Corporate Social Effects Responsibility, Company Size, Profitability, Leverage and Capital Intensity To Tax Agresivity. In Diponegoro Journal of Accounting (Vol. 4).
Online Pajak. (2019). Agresivitas Pajak, Simak Pemahaman dan Risikonya di Sini!
P. J. A. Adriani. (2018). Teori Perpajakan. Salemba Empat.
Rusydi, M. K., & Martani, D. (2014). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Aggresive Tax Avoidance. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVII.
Sembiring, M. (2006). Karakteristik perusahaan dan pengungkapan tanggung jawab sosial: Studi empiris pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 9, 1–23.
Simarmata, A. P. P., & Cahyonowati, N. (2014). Pengaruh Tax Avoidance Jangka Panjang Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kepemilikan Institusional Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2011-2012). UNDIP: Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis.
Sudana, I. M. (2015). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (Edisi 4). Penerbit BPFE.
Sujarweni, V. W. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis (Edisi 2). Penerbit Andi.
Supriyono, R. A. (2018). Akuntansi Keprilakuan. Gajah Mada University Press.
Tambunan, E. Si. (2015). Problematika Pajak di Balik Maraknya Bisnis Properti. Majalah Pajak.
Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2019). Financial Accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
