Ratio Decidendi of the Panel of Judges in Passing Judgement (Case Study of Case Decision No. 202/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Gin)
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Putu Dyah Pramitha Dewi*
I Gede Yusa
This paper aimed to find out more deeply and understand the validity of debt and receivable agreements made by debtors and creditors with collateral for joint assets and to be able to find out and analyze the ratio of decisions of the Panel of Judges in handing down decisions. The method used is the normative research method, which uses several types of approaches, namely the case approach and the statute approach, the context of which is carried out by examining laws relating to legal issues. The results obtained from this research are that the debt and receivable agreement made by the parties in case Number 202/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Gin is not in accordance with the provisions of Article 36 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and ratio decidendi The Panel of Judges in this decision did not contain a legal basis explaining that the debt and receivable agreement made by the parties was legally valid.
Akomar, M., Susilowati, I. F., & SH, M. H. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 10/PDT. G/2019/PN. DPS Tentang Hutang Piutang Yang Dibuat Dengan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. NOVUM: JURNAL HUKUM, 280–293.
Amaliya, L., Abas, M., & Akbar, M. G. G. (2022). Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Utang Piutang Yang Dibuat Dalam Bentuk Akta di Bawah Tangan. Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 1–12.
Bisma, P. A. S. (2023). Hermeneutika Majelis Hakim Terkait Ratio Decidendi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 172/Pdt/2019/PT DPS). Al-Dalil Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Hukum, 1(2).
Bujangga, I. K. W. A., & Purwanto, I. W. N. (2022). Application of the Liability Principle in the Land Sale as Joint Property Before a Notary. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 1(4), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i4.433
Cowandy, C. N. (2021). Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Utang-Piutangdi Balik Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(4), 1–4.
Edlynafitri, R. S. (2017). Keabsahan Perjanjian Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Atas Objek Harta Bersama yang Tidak Sesuai Prosedur. Lex Administratum, 5(7).
Fadzoli, I. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Perjanjian Utang Piutang dengan Jaminan Berupa Tanah Berstatus Harta Waris yang Belum Terbagi (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Utang Piutang antara X dan Y di Desa Trimulyo, Kecamatan Sleman). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Fauziana, R., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2019). Implementation Of The Sale And Purchase Agreement And The Status Of Ownership Of Land Rights At Apartment In Payon Amartha View Of Semarang. Jurnal Akta, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v6i3.5100
Hamdani, A., & Huda, M. (2024). Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Atas Dasar Utang Piutang (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 10/Pdt. G/2019/PN Dps). Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(2), 1079–1085.
Jamil, K., & Nury & Rumawi, R. (2020). Implikasi asas pacta sunt servanda pada keadaan memaksa (force majeure) dalam hukum perjanjian indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(7), 1044–1054.
Maharani, A. P. (2020). Keabsahan Perjanjian Jual Beli Yang Berawal Dari Hubungan Utang Piutang (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Sleman No. 86/Pdt. G/2018/PN. Smn).
PUTRA, D. A. (2023). Keabsahan Penggunaan Pengikatan Jual Beli Dan Kuasa Menjual Dalam Konstruksi Hubungan Utang Piutang.
Rizqi, A. F. (2024). Kekuatan Pembuktian Perjanjian Utang Piutang Dalam Akta Di Bawah Tangan. Prosiding Mewujudkan Sistem Hukum Nasional Berbasis Pancasila, 1, 213–219.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2009). Freedom of Agreement and Balanced Protection for Parties in Bank Credit Agreements in Indonesia. PT. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Tiodor, P. C., & Tjahyani, M. (2023). Pembuktian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang Piutang Secara Lisan. Krisna Law: Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana, 5(1), 27–39.
Tjoanda, M., Hetharie, Y., Pariela, M. V. G., & Sopamena, R. F. (2021). The Outbreak of Covid-19 as an Overmacht Claim in Credit Agreements. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 75–92.
Wiyono, A. T. P., & Yulianingsih, W. (2024). Ratio Decidendi Hakim Dalam Putusan Nomor 1393/PDT. G/2022/PN. SBY Berkenaan Dengan Perjanjian Utang Piutang Dengan Objek Saham Sebagai Jaminan. Kabillah: Journal of Social Community, 9(1), 320–326.
Yulianingrum, A. V., & Prasetyo, B. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Ratio Decidendi Majelis Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Vonis Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tenggarong Nomor 390/Pid. Sus/2021/Pn. Trg. UIR Law Review, 6(2), 61–71.
Yuris, R. F., & Sudiro, A. (2023). Responsibility Of The Head Of The National Land Agency For The Issuance Of Land Ownership Certificates With Administrative Legal Defects. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 2(4 SE-Articles), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v2i4.911
