The Effectiveness of Police Intelligence in Handling Mining-Related Crimes: Evidence from Kutai Kartanegara (2023-2025)
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Redika Adytia Silalahi*
Surya Nita
Sylvia Prisca Delima
Illegal mining remains one of the most persistent criminal challenges in Kutai Kartanegara, marked by recurring hotspots, organized operations, and frequent use of heavy machinery. Police records from 2023–2025 show fluctuating yet consistently high activity, totaling twenty cases. While several cases advanced to Stage II (P21) and were transferred to the District Attorney, many remained at the inquiry stage, revealing weaknesses in intelligence detection, evidence gathering, and identification of broader criminal networks. This study examines how police intelligence investigations are conducted, the operational challenges encountered, and the effectiveness of intelligence-led policing against illegal mining. Using qualitative field research, the study combines non-participatory observation and semi-structured interviews with key officials, including the heads of the Criminal Investigation Unit, Intelligence Unit, and General Crime Sub-Unit. Primary field data are supported by police documents, regulations, and previous academic literature, then analyzed through descriptive qualitative methods and triangulation. Findings show strong tactical capability in detecting active sites and advancing cases to Stage II. However, major limitations persist: difficult access to remote areas, limited surveillance technology, weak inter-agency coordination, and difficulty mapping networks beyond field operators. Consequently, illegal mining repeatedly occurs in the same locations, indicating current intelligence practices are insufficient for long-term prevention. Strengthening analytical capacity, improving technological support, and enhancing collaboration are essential to increase enforcement effectiveness.
Al Waroi, M. N. A. L. (2024). Coordination and collaboration between secret intelligence agencies and government institutions: challenges, opportunities, and dynamics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7, 4626–4635.
Alkadrie, S. M. R. R. M., & Fitrian, Y. (2025). Hukum Pidana dalam Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Indonesia: Perspektif Normatif dan Tantangan Penegakan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, 248–265.
Barrett, S., & White, R. (2017). Disrupting environmental crime at the local level: an operational perspective. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 2.
Bayley, D. H. (2005). Changing the guard: Developing democratic police abroad. Oxford University Press.
Bottoms, A. E., & Wiles, P. (2020). Environmental criminology. In Crime, inequality and the state (pp. 273–293). Routledge.
Chandra, A. (2024). Formulasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pertambangan Ilegal (Studi Kasus di Kepolisian Daerah Kepulauan Riau). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Febrian, F. (2020). The Implementation of Friedman’s Theory in the Context of Legal System in lndonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 4(6).
Fernandez, M. E., Ten Hoor, G. A., Van Lieshout, S., Rodriguez, S. A., Beidas, R. S., Parcel, G., Ruiter, R. A. C., Markham, C. M., & Kok, G. (2019). Implementation mapping: using intervention mapping to develop implementation strategies. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 158.
Ihsan, M., Kamal, M., & Putri, H. (2025). The Environmental Degradation and Weak Law Enforcement in Illegal Mining Activities: A Juridicial Review. International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities, 2(2), 253–265.
Kostić, J., & Matić Bošković, M. (2025). Can criminal law be an effective response for environmental disasters caused by mining? Pedro & João Editores.
Kurniawan, L., & Dharma, G. A. (2025). Kompleksitas Kejahatan Tambang yang Berdaulat. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(3), 5005–5016.
Manungkalit, J. R. (2025). Peran Polsek Kelapa Kampit dalam Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Daerah Rawan Kriminalitas Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia. UPT. Perpustakaan Undaris.
Ovsіanіuk, D. (2024). Intelligence cycle as the basis of analytical activity in combating drug-related crime. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 2(14), 95–104.
Putri, M. K. P., Ashari, D. A., & Pratama, R. D. (2024). Aksentuasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Mafia Tambang Melalui Penerapan Sistem Interoperabilitas Dalam Mendorong Kewenangan Otonomi Daerah Yang Berkeadilan. Journal of Studia Legalia, 5(02).
Ratcliffe, J. H. (2016). Intelligence-led policing. Routledge.
Schneider, S. (2006). Privatizing economic crime enforcement: Exploring the role of private sector investigative agencies in combating money laundering. Policing & Society, 16(3), 285–312.
Soekanto, S. (2004). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Raja Grafindo.
Strang, S. J. (2014). Network analysis in criminal intelligence. In Networks and network analysis for defence and security (pp. 1–26). Springer.
Williams, G. (2014). Environmental and organisational drivers for the nature of the relationship between illegal miners and mining companies [University of Pretoria]. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/45008
Wulandary, R. (2021). Analisis Terhadap Upaya Kepolisian Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Melakukan Penambangan Emas Tanpa Izin (PETI) Di Wilayah Hukum Polsek Kuantan Tengah. Universitas Islam Riau.
Yeboah, S. A. (2023). Digging deeper: The impact of illegal mining on economic growth and development in Ghana [Sunyani Technical University]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117641/
