An Impact Analysis of Retrofit Shading and Double Skin Facade on Building Performance at the Glass Office of PT Pertamina Patra Niaga - ITJ Jakarta
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Sumarno*
Tigor Wilfritz Soaduon Panjaitan
Andarita Rolalisasi
Modern office buildings with glass envelopes often encounter challenges in energy efficiency, particularly due to excessive reliance on artificial lighting during daytime and intensive use of cooling systems. This condition is occurred at the PT Pertamina Patra Niaga - ITJ Jakarta office building. The installation of window films and curtain blinds has made interior spaces darker, preventing optimal utilization of natural daylight and consequently increasing electricity consumption. Such conditions not only reduce energy efficiency but also compromise visual comfort for occupants. This study aims to analyze the impact of retrofit shading and the double skin façade (DSF) on daylighting performance, visual comfort, and energy efficiency. The research employed an existing condition analysis using the Sefaira plug in SketchUp software and Sefaira web model - energyplus to simulate and evaluate the effects of retrofitting on the glass office building. The findings reveal that the integration of retrofit shading and DSF significantly improves natural daylighting quality 2% underlit, 42% well lit, and 44% overlit. Visual comfort was enhanced by lowering indoor illuminance levels of ASE from 87% to 43% lux and sDA from 100% to 98% lux, aligning with recommended standards. Furthermore, annual electricity consumption decreased substantially, from 269 to 130 kWh/m² per year. In conclusion, retrofit shading and DSF provide effective passive design strategies that enhance daylight utilization, improve occupant comfort, and support energy conservation. This study serves as a preliminary investigation for future research on integrating multiple passive design strategies in office building retrofits.
Ahriz, A., Boutouil, M., & Jaziri, A. (2022). Performance evaluation of double-skin façade for office buildings in Mediterranean climate. Sustainable Cities and Society, 80, 103791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103791
Aksamija, A. (2013). Sustainable Facades: Design Methods for High-Performance Building Envelopes. Wiley.
Aruta, G., Ascione, F., Bianco, N., Iovane, T., & Mauro, G. M. (2023). A responsive double skin façade for the retrofit of existing buildings: Analysis on an office building in a Mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 267.
Ascione, F., Bianco, N., De Masi, R. F., Mauro, G. M., & Vanoli, G. P. (2021). Retrofit of building façade using double skin systems: Energy and environmental analysis for Mediterranean climates. Energy and Buildings, 231, 110594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110594
Azeem, F., Memon, Z., & Ammar, A. (2025). Transition to green building through retrofitting: Quantitative analysis of appropriate sizing of lighting, cooling and water consumption using parametric variations in residential building. Buildings, 15(6), 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060939
Chao, J., Zhou, Y., Li, K., & Wei, D. (2023). Impact of green roof and green façade on building thermal performance and carbon sequestration in subtropical climate of China. Journal of Building Physics, 46(5).
Dewi, E. P., Wijaya, A., Sujatini, S., Rahmana, D., Mandela, C., & Gulit, F. (2020). Penerapan Double Skin Facade pada daerah iklim tropis. IKRA-ITH Teknologi Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 4(2).
Dvorak, B. (2021). Ecoregional green roofs: Theory and application in the Western USA and Canada. Springer.
Givoni, B. (1998). Climate considerations in building and urban design. John Wiley & Sons.
Hendrik, M. L., & Tualaka, T. M. C. (2023). Penerapan Double Skin Façade sebagai strategi efisiensi energi bangunan di daerah beriklim tropis. GEWANG, 5(1).
Herzog, T., Krippner, R., & Lang, W. (2004). Facade Construction Manual. Birkhäuser.
Huang, H., Zhu, K., & Lin, X. (2023). Research on formulating energy benchmarks for various types of existing residential buildings from the perspective of typology: A case study of Chongqing, China. Buildings, 13(5), 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051346
Islam, M. T., Ahmed, M. S., Rahman, M. M., & Ghaffarianhoseini, A. (2021). Investigation of shading devices on commercial buildings in subtropical climate. Energy Reports, 7, 7929–7943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.045
Jaber, S., Ajib, S., & Rahmeh, T. (2022). The role of double-skin facade configurations in optimizing building performance in a temperate climate. Frontiers in Built Environment, 8, 838732.
Kaewpraek, P., Rattanongphisat, W., & Chaiwiwatworakul, P. (2023). Energy performance of optimized shading and ventilated façade systems in tropical environments. Sustainable Cities and Society, 92, 104–122.
Kaewpraek, C. (2023). Advances in Retrofitting Strategies for Energy Efficiency in Tropical Climates: A Systematic Review and Analysis. Buildings, 14(6), 1633.
Koç, S., & Maçka Kalfa, S. (2021). Energy performance assessment of fixed external shading devices in office buildings under Mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 236, 110765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110765
Kuhn, T. E. (2017). State of the art of advanced solar control devices for buildings. Solar Energy, 154, 112–133.
Olgyay, V. (1963). Design with Climate: Bioclimatic Approach to Architectural Regionalism. Princeton University Press.
Reinhart, C. F., & Andersen, M. (2006). Development and validation of a Radiance model for a translucent panel. Energy and Buildings, 38((7)), 890–904. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.006
Santamouris, M., & Tsangrassoulis, A. (2020). Advances in shading technologies and daylighting: energy and visual performance. Energy and Buildings, 226, 110–234.
Sharma, A., Kumar, A., & Mathur, J. (2022). Integrated passive design strategies for reducing cooling loads in tropical office buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103–118.
Sharma, S. K., Mohapatra, S., Sharma, R. C., Alturjman, S., Altrjman, C., Mostarda, L., & Stephan, A. (2022). Energy performance optimization of office buildings through passive design strategies in composite climate. Journal of Building Engineering, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104669
Singh, M., Bhusal, P., & Mainali, B. (2022). Impact of façade retrofitting on daylighting and cooling performance in warm–humid climates. Building and Environment, 212, 108–126.
Szokolay, S. V. (2004). Introduction to architectural science: The basis of sustainable design. Architectural Press.
Szokolay, S. V. (2014). Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design (3rd (ed.)). Routledge.
Tsangrassoulis, A., & Kontaxis, G. C. (2015). Double skin façade: A literature review. Advances in Building Energy Research, 9(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2014.932498
Tzempelikos, A., & Athienitis, A. K. (2021). The effects of shading devices on office building energy performance in Mediterranean climate regions. Building and Environment, 46(5), 1231–1242.
Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2000). Preferred luminous conditions in open‐plan offices: Research and practice recommendations. Lighting Research & Technology, 32(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/096032710003200404
Wilkinson, S., & Dixon, T. (2016). Green roof retrofit: Building urban resilience. Wiley Blackwell.
