ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE POLICY IN THE SOCIAL INTERACTIONS OF PONDOK PESANTREN DARUL MA'ARIF KAPLONGAN
Main Article Content
Akhmad Wa’adi*
Ahmad Maskur Subaweh
Fithry Muthmainnah
This study analyzes linguistic politeness in social interactions at Darul Ma'arif Kaplongan Islamic Boarding School, Indramayu, using a qualitative descriptive approach. The objectives are to identify forms of linguistic politeness, analyze influencing factors, and evaluate its impact on the quality of social interactions in the Islamic boarding school environment. Data collection methods include participant observation, in-depth interviews, documentation, and focus group discussions, with analysis using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana. Results show dominant forms of linguistic politeness include the use of Krama Inggil Javanese, polite second-person pronouns, controlled intonation and voice volume, and religious expressions. Influencing factors include social hierarchy, Islamic values, students' cultural backgrounds, and school rules. Linguistic politeness implications include character formation, social relationship harmonization, increased learning effectiveness, and preservation of traditional values. In conclusion, linguistic politeness in Islamic boarding school environment functions not only as a communication tool but also as a means of character education, tradition preservation, and creation of a harmonious social environment. This research provides important insights into the role of linguistic politeness in the context of traditional Islamic education.
Azra, A. (2019). Pendidikan Islam: tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan milenium III. Prenada Media.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Issue 4). Cambridge university press.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. Bobbs-Merrill.
Bruinessen, M. van. (2012). Kitab kuning, pesantren, dan tarekat: tradisi-tradisi Islam di Indonesia. In Yogyakarta: Gading Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Dhofier, Z. (2011). Tradisi pesantren: studi pandangan hidup kyai dan visinya mengenai masa depan Indonesia. In Jakarta: LP3ES.
Faizin, A. (2020). Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Pembelajaran di Pondok Pesantren Salafiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 45–58.
Hidayati. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Interaksi Santri dan Ustadz di Pondok Pesantren Modern. Lingua, 14(1), 29–42.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.
Mahmud. (2021). Pola Kesantunan Berbahasa di Pesantren Tradisional dan Modern. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 39(1), 75–90.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks. Cal.: Sage Publications, 4.
Pranowo. (2009). Berbahasa secara Santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rohmah. (2019). Strategi Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Komunikasi Antarbudaya di Pesantren. Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(2), 183–196.
Soekanto, S. (2012). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.
