THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP STYLE, COMMUNICATION AND MOTIVATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PASAMAN DISTRICT EDUCATION SERVICE EMPLOYEES
Main Article Content
Ria Widhia Sari*
Endarwita
Mai Yuliza
Elondri
Employees are the backbone of any organization, and their performance directly impacts success. In the education sector, a well-functioning workforce is crucial for student achievement. Effective leadership, clear communication, and motivated employees are all thought to be important for strong performance in organizations. This study is looking into the effect on the performance of Pasaman Regency Education Service Employees of Leadership Style, Communication, and Motivation. 45 staff members from the Pasaman Regency Education Office made up the population of this research. This study sample applies the whole sampling method. Multiple linear regression was used to examine research data acquired by means of a questionnaire distribution approach. Research findings reveal that staff of Pasaman Regency Education Service perform significantly differently depending on their leadership style, partly. With a significance value of 0.551 > 0.05, communication has no appreciable effect on employee performance; motivation similarly has no appreciable effect on performance with a significance value of 0.112 > alpha 0.05. With a significance value of 0.000 alpha 0.05, Leadership Style, Communication, and Motivation concurrently significantly affect the Performance of Pasaman Regency Education Service Employees. From the Coefficient of Determination Test (R2), a value of 0.667 was obtained suggesting that Leadership Style, Communication, and Motivation contribute 66.7% to Employee Performance at the Pasaman Regency Education Office.
Amirullah, A. (2015). Pengantar Manajemen. Fungsi–Proses–Pengendalian. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Biatna, T. (2001). Analisis Faktor Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Faktor EtosKerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Organisasi yang Telah Menerapkan. Jurnal Standarisasi, 9.
Geralt, F. E., Koleangan, R. A. M., & Sepang, J. L. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Komunikasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pt Bringin Karya Sejahtera. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 8(2).
Guterres, L. A., & Supartha, W. G. (2016). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja Guru. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 5(03), 71–80.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2003). Manajemen sumber daya manusia, Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Hosnawati, H. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Etos Kerja Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Profita: Kajian Ilmu Akuntansi, 4(3).
Jogiyanto, H. M., & Abdillah, W. (2009). Konsep dan Aplikasi PLS untuk penelitian empiris. Yogyakarta: BPFE-UGM.
Mahmudi. (2010). Public Sector Performance Management, UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Mangkunegara, P. A. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Nurhamiden, R. K., & Trang, I. (2015). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Komunikasi, Dan Pembagian Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Polisi Pada Polda Sulut Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(3).
Panjaitan, M. (2017). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan dan komunikasi terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Putri Megah Asri Indah Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Methonomi, 3(1), 30–42.
Rivai, V. (2013). Kepemimpinan dan perilaku organisasi.
Robbins, S. P. (2008). Organizational behavior. Indonesian Edition. Jakarta: PT GRAMEDIA Group Index.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif-Kuantitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, P. (2009). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta. Teece, DJ (1984). Economic Analysis and Strategic Management. California Management Review, 26(3), 87–110.
Waridin, M. (2006). Pengaruh motivasi kerja, kepuasan kerja, budaya organisasi dan kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja pegawai. Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 7(2).
