THE INFLUENCE OF GREEDY, OPPORTUNITY, NEED AND EXPOSURE ON STUDENTS' ACADEMIC CHEATING PERFORMANCE
(Survey on Students of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Class of 2020, Universitas Siliwangi)
##plugins.themes.EpsilonTheme.article.main##
Ayu Rosma*
Ai Nur Solihat
Gugum Gumilar
This study seeks to examine how students' academic cheating behavior is influenced by factors such as greed, opportunity, need, and exposure. The research employs a quantitative survey approach with an explanatory research design. The study population comprises 1,289 active students from the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education at Siliwangi University, who are members of the class of 2020. A Proportional Random Sampling technique was used, resulting in a sample size of 305 respondents. Data was collected through questionnaires, and data analysis included multiple linear regression analysis, as well as partial and simultaneous hypothesis testing. The findings indicate that while greed does not significantly impact students' academic cheating behavior (p = 0.105), opportunity has a significant effect (p = 0.000), need also plays a significant role (p = 0.031), and exposure does not have a significant influence (p = 0.252). Additionally, when considering all these factors together, greed, opportunity, need, and exposure collectively have a significant impact on students' academic cheating behavior (p = 0.000).
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination. South-Western Cengage Learning. Mason, OH.
Amiruddin, I. A., Alwi, M. A., & Fakhri, N. (2022). Prokrastinasi dan Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Talenta Mahasiswa, 1(4).
Astrina, F., Sabrina, N., Arifin, M. A., & Agustini, H. (2022). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang). Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 19(2), 257–271.
Buana, Z. P., & Soetjiningsih, C. H. (2019). Penalaran Moral Dan Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Yang Sedang Mengerjakan Skripsi. Jurnal Psikologi Perseptual, 4(1), 65.
Budiman, N. A. (2018). Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa: Dimensi fraud diamond dan gone theory. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 11(1), 75–90.
Christiana, A., Kristiani, A., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Kecurangan pembelajaran daring pada awal pandemi: Dimensi fraud pentagon. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 19(1), 66–83.
Dewi, Y., & Fadjarenie, R. A. (2020). The effect of fraud specialist role on internal control using the mediation of credit card fraud detection (Case study of a state-owned bank). International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 6285–6292.
Djaelani, Y., Zainuddin, Z., & Mokoginta, R. M. (2022). Academic fraud of students in the Covid-19 period: Testing with the Pentagon’s fraud dimension. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(2), 414–422.
Fitrianty, D. (2020). Pengaruh Greed, Opportunity, Need Dan Exposure Terhadap Kecenderungan Fraud Pada Aparatur Desa Di Kabupaten Bogor Dengan Moralitas Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Universitas Djuanda.
Gultom, S. A., & Safrida, E. (2020). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond dan gone theory terhadap academic fraud (studi kasus mahasiswa akuntansi se sumatera utara). EKSIS, 9(3), 113–124.
Hasanah, N., & Diana, N. (2018). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond dan gone theory terhadap academic fraud (studi kasus terhadap mahasiswa program studi akuntansi perguruan tinggi negeri dan perguruan tinggi swasta di malang). E_Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi, 7(02).
Ismatullah, I., & Eriswanto, E. (2016). Analisa pengaruh teori gone fraud terhadap academic fraud di Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 1(2), 134–142.
Munirah, A., & Nurkhin, A. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Fraud Diamond dan Gone Theory Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 120–139.
Neva, S., Amyar, F., & Hernusa, H. L. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond dan Gonetheory Terhadap Academic Fraud. JAS-PT (Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia), 5(1), 29–38.
Ridpath, B. D., Gurney, G., & Snyder, E. (2015). NCAA academic fraud cases and historical consistency: A comparative content analysis. J. Legal Aspects Sport, 25, 75.
Siyoto, S., & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar metodologi penelitian. Literasi Media Publishing.
Talib, D. C. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond Theory dan GONE Theory terhadap Tindak Kecurangan yang Dimoderasi Religiusitas. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Wahyuningsih, I. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh GONE Theory, Integritas, dan Religiusitas terhadap Academic Fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 6(1).
